Re: Is Solr best for did you mean functionality just like Google?

Solr is an IR system where Spell correction is a topping however Google has a team dedicated just for Spell corrections. Did you mean (more general term and much broader than basic Spell correctors) or Spell Correctors require a plethora of skills. I will just discuss Spell correctors here and not

Is Solr best for did you mean functionality just like Google?

Hello, I came in the worst condition. I want to do spell/query correction functionality. I have 49 GB indexed data where I have applied spellchecker. I want to do same as Google - *did you mean*. *Example* - If any user types any question/query which might be misspell or wrong typed. I

Re: Did you mean functionality

of work happening there as we speak. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Lucas F. A. Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:30:12 PM Subject: Did you mean functionality Hello

Re: Did you mean functionality

of work happening there as we speak. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Lucas F. A. Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:30:12 PM Subject: Did you mean functionality Hello

Re: Did you mean functionality

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any work being done on getting this into SolrJ at the moment? Just a note to those who may be new to SolrJ: you can still access new or custom functionality in a generic way via getResponse() w/o explicit SolrJ

Re: Did you mean functionality

Hmmm, good point. I had completely forgotten about that route. Thanks! Matthew Runo Software Developer Zappos.com 702.943.7833 On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any work being done on getting this

Re: Did you mean functionality

I can take it up. But should we wait for the feature to 'stabilize' before adding it to SolrJ? Till then the approach suggested by Yonik (getResponse()) should be fine --Noble On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, good point. I had completely forgotten

Re: Did you mean functionality

@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:30:12 PM Subject: Did you mean functionality Hello everybody, I need to integrate the Lucene SpellChecker Contrib lib in my applycation, but I`m using the EmbeededSolrServer to access all indexes. I want to know what should I do (if someone have any step

Did you mean functionality

Hello everybody, I need to integrate the Lucene SpellChecker Contrib lib in my applycation, but I`m using the EmbeededSolrServer to access all indexes. I want to know what should I do (if someone have any step-by-step, link, tutorial or smoke signal) of what I need to do during indexing, and

Re: Did you mean functionality

, 2008 4:30:12 PM Subject: Did you mean functionality Hello everybody, I need to integrate the Lucene SpellChecker Contrib lib in my applycation, but I`m using the EmbeededSolrServer to access all indexes. I want to know what should I do (if someone have any step-by-step, link, tutorial

Re: Did you mean functionality

://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Lucas F. A. Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:30:12 PM Subject: Did you mean functionality Hello everybody, I need to integrate the Lucene SpellChecker Contrib lib