I’ve long thought that master/slave was not the right metaphor for a pull model
anyway.
We probably should not use “replica” since that already has a use in Solr Cloud.
Where is the discussion?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jun
+1 to name change. Also 'overseer' which doesn't go well with Master/Slave!
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:16 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> priv...@lucene.apache.org but it should have been public and expect it to
> spill out to the dev list today.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Mike
priv...@lucene.apache.org but it should have been public and expect it to
spill out to the dev list today.
~ David
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Can you link to the discussion? I searched the dev list and didn’t see
> anything, is it on slack or a jira or
Hi Jan,
Can you link to the discussion? I searched the dev list and didn’t see
anything, is it on slack or a jira or somewhere else?
Mike
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:51 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi Kaya,
>
> Thanks for bringing it up. The topic is already being discussed by
> developers, so
Hi Kaya,
Thanks for bringing it up. The topic is already being discussed by developers,
so expect to see some change in this area; Not over-night, but incremental.
Also, if you want to lend a helping hand, patches are more than welcome as
always.
Jan
> 17. jun. 2020 kl. 04:22 skrev Kayak28 :
Hello, Community:
As the Github and Python will replace terminologies that relative to
slavery,
why don't we replace master-slave for Solr as well?
https://developers.srad.jp/story/18/09/14/0935201/
https://developer-tech.com/news/2020/jun/15/github-replace-slavery-terms-master-whitelist/
--
