: I guess I'm weary of a mismatch between an index and the schema, and
: can't say that I recommend that at this point without seeing where it
: may have issues.
modifying a schema without rebuilding the index from scratch is in fact
"deep voodoo" -- some things work okay; some things break horri
On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
On 2/22/07 1:37 PM, "Jack L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder what happens if I change the schema after some documents
have been inserted? Is this allowed at all? Will the index become
corrupted if I add/remove some fields? Or change the
On 2/22/07 1:37 PM, "Jack L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what happens if I change the schema after some documents
> have been inserted? Is this allowed at all? Will the index become
> corrupted if I add/remove some fields? Or change the field properties?
The schema just controls the inp
Hello Erik,
> Wouldn't even matter if there were field name "conflicts". A field
> by any other name is just a field. All document types could have a
> "title" field, for example.
That makes sense.
I wonder what happens if I change the schema after some documents
have been inserted? Is this al
