I have not seen performance degradation, but I will keep that in mind,
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Running into problems with distributed index and search
Thanks a lot, yes I found that yesterday after doing some experiments.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Running into problems with distributed index and search
: 3
How is the performace? For me, Solr got about 100 times faster for
update when I moved the files from NFS to local disk.
wunder
On 8/22/07 2:27 PM, "Kasi Sankaralingam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instance (index server) for indexing. The index file data directory
> reside on a NFS partition, I
: 3) I had to bounce the tomcat search SOLR Webapp instance for it to
: read the index files, is it mandatory? In a distributed environment, do
: we always have to
:
: Bounce the SOLR Webapp instances to reflect the changes in the index
: files?
it sounds like you esentially have a master/sl
Hi All,
This is the scenario, I have two search SOLR instances running on two
different partitions, I am treating one of the servers strictly
read-only (for search) (search server) and the other
Instance (index server) for indexing. The index file data directory
reside on a NFS partition, I am
