Re: SPLITSHARD Working
Vrinda, The expected behavior if parent shard 'shardA' resides on node'1', node'2' ... node'n' and do a SPLITSHARD on it. the child shards, shardA_0 and shardA_1 will reside on node'1', node'2' ... node'n'. shardA --- node'1' (leader) & node'2' (replica) after splitshard; shardA --- node'1' (leader) & node'2' (replica) (INACTIVE) shardA_0 -- node'1' & node'2' (ACTIVE) shardA_1 -- node'1' & node'2' (ACTIVE) Any one of them can be a leader and replica for the children nodes. Amrit Sarkar Search Engineer Lucidworks, Inc. 415-589-9269 www.lucidworks.com Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, vrindavda <vrinda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks I go it. > > But I see that distribution of shards and replicas is not equal. > > For Example in my case : > I had shard 1 and shard2 on Node 1 and their replica_1 and replica_2 on > Node 2. > I did SHARDSPLIT on shard1 to get shard1_0 and shard1_1 such that > and shard1_0_replica0 are created on Node 1 and shard1_0_replica1, > shard1_1_replica1 and shard1_1_replica0 on Node 2. > > Is this expected behavior ? > > Thank you, > Vrinda Davda > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/SPLITSHARD-Working-tp4333876p4333922.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
Re: SPLITSHARD Working
Thanks I go it. But I see that distribution of shards and replicas is not equal. For Example in my case : I had shard 1 and shard2 on Node 1 and their replica_1 and replica_2 on Node 2. I did SHARDSPLIT on shard1 to get shard1_0 and shard1_1 such that and shard1_0_replica0 are created on Node 1 and shard1_0_replica1, shard1_1_replica1 and shard1_1_replica0 on Node 2. Is this expected behavior ? Thank you, Vrinda Davda -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SPLITSHARD-Working-tp4333876p4333922.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SPLITSHARD Working
No, split always happens on the original node. But you can move the sub-shard leader to a new node once the split is complete by using AddReplica/DeleteReplica collection API. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:02 PM, vrindavda <vrinda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to SPLITSHARD such that one split remains on the same machine as > original and another uses new machines for leader and replicas. Is this > possible ? Please let me know what properties do I need to specify in > Collection API to achieve this. > > Thank you, > Vrinda Davda > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SPLITSHARD-Working-tp4333876.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
SPLITSHARD Working
Hi, I need to SPLITSHARD such that one split remains on the same machine as original and another uses new machines for leader and replicas. Is this possible ? Please let me know what properties do I need to specify in Collection API to achieve this. Thank you, Vrinda Davda -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SPLITSHARD-Working-tp4333876.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
