Re: Compiling Solr 1.3.0 + KStem

2008-12-03 Thread Rob Casson
i've experimented with the KStem stuff in the past, and just pulled a fresh copy of solr from trunk it looks like Hoss' suggestion #1 does the trick, by simply commenting out the super.init call...loaded the example data, tested some analysis, and it seems to work as before. just a confirmation,

Re: Compiling Solr 1.3.0 + KStem

2008-11-28 Thread Chris Hostetter
: /usr/local/build/apache-solr-1.3.0/src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/ : KStemFilterFactory.java:63: : cannot find symbol : [javac] symbol : method : init(org.apache : .solr.core.SolrConfig,java.util.Mapjava.lang.String,java.lang.String) : [javac] location: class

Compiling Solr 1.3.0 + KStem

2008-11-23 Thread Chris Haggstrom
I was hoping to try using KStem with Solr 1.3.0, but am having trouble getting it to compile. With a fresh Solr 1.3.0 that will build successfully, I unzipped the KStemSolr.zip within the apache-solr-1.3.0 directory, but when I then try to build (using Ant 1.7.1 and Sun HotSpot JDK 1.6.0

RE: Solr and KStem

2007-10-10 Thread Wagner,Harry
, 2007 9:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem Hi Harry, I re-discovered this thread last week and have made some minor changes to the code (remove deprication warnings) so that it compiles with trunk. I think it would be quite useful to get this stemmer into Solr once

RE: Solr and KStem

2007-09-11 Thread Wagner,Harry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:33 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem Hello, I would like to test this and have a few questions (please excuse what may seem naive questions). I would like to verify that this is purely a configuration feature

RE: Solr and KStem

2007-09-10 Thread Wagner,Harry
Yes, I don't think the licensing will be a problem as KStem already includes a wrapper for Lucene. Cheers! harry -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:40 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem Look

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-09-10 Thread Mike Klaas
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem On 9/7/07, Wagner,Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-09-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem On 9/7/07, Wagner,Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use. KStem is considered to be more appropriate for library usage since it is much less aggressive than Porter (i.e., searches

RE: Solr and KStem

2007-09-10 Thread Wagner,Harry
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem On 9/7/07, Wagner,Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented a Solr plug

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-09-10 Thread Bill Fowler
, September 07, 2007 3:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr and KStem On 9/7/07, Wagner,Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use. KStem is considered to be more appropriate for library usage since it is much less aggressive

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-09-07 Thread Walter Underwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/7/07, Wagner,Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use. KStem is considered to be more appropriate for library usage since it is much less aggressive than Porter (i.e., searches for organization do NOT match on organ

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-09-07 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
From: Walter Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 4:31:25 PM Subject: Re: Solr and KStem Even if KStem isn't ASL, we could include the plug-in code with notes about how to get the stemmer. Or, the Solr plug-in could be contributed to the group

Re: Solr and KStem

2007-08-28 Thread Mike Klaas
On 28-Aug-07, at 1:08 PM, Wagner,Harry wrote: There is a version of the KStem stemmer (http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/cgi-bin/downloads/downloads.cgi) that has been adapted for Lucene. What would be the simplest way to implement this in Solr? As a plug-in? Has anyone already done this? You