On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Jack L wrote:
Selecting by type will do the job. But I suppose it sacrifice
performance because having multiple document types in the same
index will render a larger index. Is it bad?
A many documents we talking here?
My hunch is you'll be fine :)
Erik
: I use a custom Analyzer which extends Lucene's StandardAnalyzer. When I
: configured Solr to use this one, It throws an exception
: RuntimeException(Can't set positionIncrementGap on custom analyzer +
: analyzer.getClass()).
:
: Do I need to extend a specific Analyzer for it to work with Solr?
whoops .. forgot the documentaiton link...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#head-9939da9abe85a79eb30a026e85cc4aec0beac10c
: you can use any Analyzer you want, but you can't configure a
: positionIncrementGap in the schema.xml unless your Analyzer extends
: SolrAnalyzer (the concept of a
Thanks Chris for a wonderful explanation. I completely get it now. Thanks
for the handy URL too.
Venkatesh
On 3/8/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I use a custom Analyzer which extends Lucene's StandardAnalyzer. When I
: configured Solr to use this one, It throws an exception
:
Hello there,
Howdy. I was wondering if there is a way to configure one Solr instance to
search multiple Index partitions? I read the wiki and found the entry in
SolrConfig.xml:
dataDir/var/data/solr/dataDir
Can I have mutiple directories? Comma separated?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
--
Solr looks at one index - If you want to look at multiple indexes, you
need multiple solr instances running. Check the wiki for how to set
that up:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty
(the resin and tomcat pages have something similar)
On 3/7/07, Venkatesh Seetharam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I'm implementing federated search. I do have N partitions of indexes
built and I'd like to have mutiple Solr instances in a cluster each serving
atleast 2 partitions. I was wondering if I could somehow find a way to make
Solr work with atleast 2 partitions. It looks like I need to have
Thanks Ryan for your insight. I do not wish to change Solr.
Although it seems weird, just adding a type field makes it possible
I'm not working with a DB but since we are indexing a huge vault of XML
documents, I use Hadoop + Lucene for indexing which finally generates N
number of partitions,
Selecting by type will do the job. But I suppose it sacrifice
performance because having multiple document types in the same
index will render a larger index. Is it bad?
--
Best regards,
Jack
Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 2:15:14 PM, you wrote:
As it is now... I don't think so. SolrCore is a
