Hi,
I'm in the process of evaluating solr and sphinx, and have come to
realize that actually having a large data set to run them against
would be handy. However, I'm pretty new to both systems, so thought
that perhaps asking around my produce something useful.
What *I* mean by largish is
You might be interested in the Lucene Java contrib/Benchmark task,
which provides an indexing implementation of a download of Wikipedia
(available at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/wikipedia/)
It is pretty trivial to convert the indexing code to send add
commands to Solr.
HTH,
Grant
Hi Yonik.
Do you have any performance statistics about those changes?
Is it possible to upgrade to this new Lucene version using the Solr 1.2
stable version?
Regards,
Daniel
On 17/9/07 17:37, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to see what performance will be like on the next
If you want to see what performance will be like on the next release,
you could try upgrading Solr's internal version of lucene to trunk
(current dev version)... there have been some fantastic improvements
in indexing speed.
For query speed/throughput, Solr 1.2 or trunk should do fine.
-Yonik
17 sep 2007 kl. 12.06 skrev David Welton:
I'm in the process of evaluating solr and sphinx, and have come to
realize that actually having a large data set to run them against
would be handy. However, I'm pretty new to both systems, so thought
that perhaps asking around my produce something
