Re: qf in conjunction with boost

2019-06-29 Thread Mark Sholund
On further reading it seems that maybe

=map(popularity_d,0,0,1) might work

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 8:56 PM, Shawn Heisey  wrote:

> On 6/27/2019 8:54 PM, Mark Sholund wrote:
>> qf=title^5 description^5 _text_
>>
>> And now I want to include additional boosting based on a popularity
>> score include with some documents. I’ve done this as follows
>>
>> q={!boost b=map(popularity_d,0,0,1)}
>>
>> However now it seems that the score is the same regardless of whether qf
>> is included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.
>
> qf is a parameter for the dismax and edismax query parsers, but your
> query has changed to the boost query parser. It is very unlikely that
> the boost parser uses the qf parameter.
>
> It looks like using edismax with its "boost" parameter MIGHT be what you
> are after:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html
>
> The edismax parser also supports the bq and bf parameters from the
> dismax parser:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-dismax-query-parser.html#bq-boost-query-parameter
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: Pmcrypto Golang 0.0.1 (ddacebe0)
Comment: https://protonmail.com
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=BNNh
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

Re: qf in conjunction with boost

2019-06-29 Thread Mark Sholund
Thanks for you reply.

The problem I ran into with using the boost parameter was that not all of my 
documents have the boosting field and those were coming back with a score of 
zero.  I tried setting a default for that field but it didn’t help. I found 
somewhere that using the boost parser with a map function would get me around 
that and it seemed to until I noticed that the qf parameter was being ignored. 
Maybe I can use bf instead.

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 8:56 PM, Shawn Heisey  wrote:

> On 6/27/2019 8:54 PM, Mark Sholund wrote:
>> qf=title^5 description^5 _text_
>>
>> And now I want to include additional boosting based on a popularity
>> score include with some documents. I’ve done this as follows
>>
>> q={!boost b=map(popularity_d,0,0,1)}
>>
>> However now it seems that the score is the same regardless of whether qf
>> is included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.
>
> qf is a parameter for the dismax and edismax query parsers, but your
> query has changed to the boost query parser. It is very unlikely that
> the boost parser uses the qf parameter.
>
> It looks like using edismax with its "boost" parameter MIGHT be what you
> are after:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html
>
> The edismax parser also supports the bq and bf parameters from the
> dismax parser:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-dismax-query-parser.html#bq-boost-query-parameter
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: Pmcrypto Golang 0.0.1 (ddacebe0)
Comment: https://protonmail.com
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=BNNh
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

Re: qf in conjunction with boost

2019-06-29 Thread Shawn Heisey

On 6/27/2019 8:54 PM, Mark Sholund wrote:

qf=title^5 description^5 _text_

And now I want to include additional boosting based on a popularity 
score include with some documents. I’ve done this as follows


q={!boost b=map(popularity_d,0,0,1)}

However now it seems that the score is the same regardless of whether qf 
is included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.


qf is a parameter for the dismax and edismax query parsers, but your 
query has changed to the boost query parser.  It is very unlikely that 
the boost parser uses the qf parameter.


It looks like using edismax with its "boost" parameter MIGHT be what you 
are after:


https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html

The edismax parser also supports the bq and bf parameters from the 
dismax parser:


https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-dismax-query-parser.html#bq-boost-query-parameter

Thanks,
Shawn


Re: qf in conjunction with boost

2019-06-29 Thread Mark Sholund
No responses yet, is my question unclear or is this not possible?

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:54 PM, Mark Sholund  
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have been using the following to boost based on field content.
>
> qf=title^5 description^5 _text_
>
> And now I want to include additional boosting based on a popularity score 
> include with some documents. I’ve done this as follows
>
> q={!boost b=map(popularity_d,0,0,1)}
>
> However now it seems that the score is the same regardless of whether qf is 
> included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.
>
> Can I do both of these boostings?  A multiplicative boost on the fields is 
> acceptable if that’s possible and simplifies an answer.
>
> - Mark-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: Pmcrypto Golang 0.0.1 (ddacebe0)
Comment: https://protonmail.com
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=BNNh
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

qf in conjunction with boost

2019-06-27 Thread Mark Sholund
Hello,

I have been using the following to boost based on field content.

qf=title^5 description^5 _text_

And now I want to include additional boosting based on a popularity score 
include with some documents. I’ve done this as follows

q={!boost b=map(popularity_d,0,0,1)}

However now it seems that the score is the same regardless of whether qf is 
included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.

Can I do both of these boostings?  A multiplicative boost on the fields is 
acceptable if that’s possible and simplifies an answer.

- Mark-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: Pmcrypto Golang 0.0.1 (ddacebe0)
Comment: https://protonmail.com
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=BNNh
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-