Hi Edwin,
What code is actually doing the indexing? AFAIK Solr doesn't include any
code for actually walking a folder, extracting the content from .eml
files and pushing this data into its index, so I'm guessing you've built
something external?
Charlie
On 01/06/2020 02:13, Zheng Lin Edwin
Trying to setup solr 8.4.1 + open jdk 11 on centos , enabled the ssl
configurations with all the certs in place, but the issue what I am seeing
is when trying to hit /update api on non-leader solr node , its throwing an
error
configured 2 solr nodes with 1 zookeeper.
metadata":[
Hi,I am new to use Solr and Jaeger and currently I am working on how to use Jaeger to find trace of Solr. I get the problem that Jaeger seems unable to catch trace from Solr.I am using the Techproducts example data on Solr. I initiate the Solr service by running ./bin/solr start -e cloud. But the
You should not have other processes/container running on the same node. They
potentially screw up your os cache making things slow, eg if the other
processes also read files etc they can remove things from Solr from the Os
cache and then the os cache needs to be filled again.
What performance
Hello,
is it possible to retrieve index terms in the descending order using terms
handler, right now we get all terms in ascending order.
Thanks,Jigar Gajjar
On 6/1/2020 9:29 AM, Odysci wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice on improving performance of our solr setup.
Does anyone have any insights on what would be better for maximizing
throughput on multiple searches being done at the same time?
thanks!
In almost all cases, adding memory will
Hi,I have a SOLR installation in master-slave configuration. The slave is used
only for reads and master for writes.
I wanted to know if there is anything I can do to improve the performance of
the readonly Slave instance?
I am running SOLR 8.5 and Java 14. The JVM has 24GB of ram allocated.
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice on improving performance of our solr setup. In
particular, about the trade-offs between applying larger machines, vs more
smaller machines. Our full index has just over 100 million docs, and we do
almost all searches using fq's (with q=*:*) and facets. We are using
Reading all the documents is going to be slow. If you want to do that, use a
database.
You do NOT keep all of the index in heap. Solr doesn’t work like that.
Your JVM heap is probably way too big for 2 million documents, but I doubt that
is the performance issue. We use an 8 GB heap for all of
Hi Even I am facing issue with ant build for lucene6.0 version, even after
changing the URLS from http to https .
Can you please provide the exact change files to make ant build to be work.
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi Guys,
We were planning on using 7 physical servers for our solr node with 64 VCPUs
2GHZ and 128 GRAM each but due to some constrains we had to use virtual
environment that does not has the same amount of cpus. We were suggested to use
less cpus with higher ghz.
Do we need to look for L1-L3
Is this odd use-case where one needs to convert Lucene query to Solr query?
Isn't this normal use-case when somebody is trying to port their Lucene
code to Solr?
I mean, is it like a XY problem where I should not even run into this
problem in the first place?
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:40 AM
Hi,Thanks for the replies so far.
Walter: We have a few more solr cores. So the JVM is sized accordingly. I know
we can separate the cores but for easier maintainability we have only one core.
Also only one core is being used majority of the times.
Jorn: I dont have a particular performance
13 matches
Mail list logo
