About ten years ago, I accidentally put indexes on an NFS volume. Solr ran
about 100X slower, so I haven’t tried it since.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
>
> Yes,
NFS isn't the first choice. That said, numbers of organizations _doou
have to manally remove _ use NFS for their Lucene indexes. See the
recommendations here:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/store/NativeFSLockFactory.html
What it really amounts to is that you may find
Yes, and we're doing such things at my company. However we most often do
things you shouldn't do; this is one of these.
Solr needs to load data quite fast, otherwise you'll be having a
performance killer. It's often recommended to use an SSD instead of a
normal hard disk; a network share would be