Re: Parent child documents partial update

2017-07-18 Thread Sujay Bawaskar
Yup, got it! On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Amrit Sarkar wrote: > Sujay, > > Lucene index is in flat-object document style, so I really not think nested > documents at index / storage will ever be supported unless someone change > the very intricacy of the index. > >

Re: Parent child documents partial update

2017-07-18 Thread Amrit Sarkar
Sujay, Lucene index is in flat-object document style, so I really not think nested documents at index / storage will ever be supported unless someone change the very intricacy of the index. Amrit Sarkar Search Engineer Lucidworks, Inc. 415-589-9269 www.lucidworks.com Twitter

Re: Parent child documents partial update

2017-07-17 Thread Sujay Bawaskar
Thanks Amrit. So storage mechanism of parent child documents is limiting the capability of partial update. It would be great to have flawless parent child index support in solr. On 17-Jul-2017 11:14 PM, "Amrit Sarkar" wrote: > Sujay, > > Not really. Parent-child

Re: Parent child documents partial update

2017-07-17 Thread Amrit Sarkar
Sujay, Not really. Parent-child documents are stored in a single block contiguously. Read more about parent-child relationship at: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2/multiple-documents-with-same-doc-id-in-index-in-solr-cloud-32c072db2164 While we perform partial / atomic update, say {"id":"X",