Re: admin-extra
Do you use it? If so, how? Upayavira On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, at 02:05 AM, Bill Au wrote: > admin-extra allows one to include additional links and/or information in > the Solr admin main page: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Core-Specific+Tools > > Bill > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Upayavirawrote: > > > Do you use admin-extra within the admin UI? > > > > If so, please go to [1] and document your use case. The feature > > currently isn't implemented in the new admin UI, and without use-cases, > > it likely won't be - so if you want it in there, please help us > > understand how you use it! > > > > Thanks! > > > > Upayavira > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8140 > >
Re: admin-extra
admin-extra allows one to include additional links and/or information in the Solr admin main page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Core-Specific+Tools Bill On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Upayavirawrote: > Do you use admin-extra within the admin UI? > > If so, please go to [1] and document your use case. The feature > currently isn't implemented in the new admin UI, and without use-cases, > it likely won't be - so if you want it in there, please help us > understand how you use it! > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8140 >
Re: admin-extra file in multicore
: // a quick hack to get rid of get-file.jsp -- note this still spits out invalid HTML : out.write( org.apache.solr.handler.admin.ShowFileRequestHandler.getFileContents( admin-extra.html ) ); : % : : Instead of resolving with the core.getName() path ... the problem isn't that it should resolve relative core.getName(), the problem is that it's a static method which uses the static singleton core ... even if the static method took in a SolrCore as a param, the way admin-extras.html use to work is that it depended on the admin-extras.html file not being hidden in the declaration, and to make that work properly in multicore the JSP needs to interogate the ShowFileRequestHanlder -- but there may be 0, or more then 1. it's really just a big headache. : Was trying to avoid building a custom solr.war for this project is there : another quick hack to include content for admin backend or is patching : the only way? not at the moment. -Hoss