Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Oct 21 23:42:03 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig.8: Don't mention ciphertext
After all, this is not cgd(4).
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.49 -r1.50
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Oct 21 23:42:03 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig.8: Don't mention ciphertext
After all, this is not cgd(4).
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.49 -r1.50
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Oct 21 23:38:26 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig: Improve recent caching edit to man page
Explain that typical usage patterns don't run into consistency issues.
Xref the -i flag.
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Oct 21 23:38:26 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig: Improve recent caching edit to man page
Explain that typical usage patterns don't run into consistency issues.
Xref the -i flag.
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Oct 20 12:45:17 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig: Add caution to man page about cache bypassing behavior
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.46 -r1.47
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Oct 20 12:45:17 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/vnconfig: vnconfig.8
Log Message:
vnconfig: Add caution to man page about cache bypassing behavior
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.46 -r1.47
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Aug 14 13:54:05 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/distrib/amd64/installimage: installimage.mk
Log Message:
amd64 installimage: Reduce non-xz size slightly to fit 4GB flash drives
The installimage sizes were bumped in 2022 because of
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Aug 14 13:54:05 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/distrib/amd64/installimage: installimage.mk
Log Message:
amd64 installimage: Reduce non-xz size slightly to fit 4GB flash drives
The installimage sizes were bumped in 2022 because of
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Jul 29 23:11:51 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man4: nvmm.4
Log Message:
nvmm(4): Document that VMX Unrestricted Guest is required
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/share/man/man4/nvmm.4
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Jul 29 23:11:51 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man4: nvmm.4
Log Message:
nvmm(4): Document that VMX Unrestricted Guest is required
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/share/man/man4/nvmm.4
Taylor R Campbell writes:
> Well, what happened is:
>
> 1. I was drafting posix_memalign and aligned_alloc for libbsdmalloc in
>response to the thread about static program size yesterday, and
>carefully reading the specs -- POSIX 2018, C11 -- to make sure I
>got all the details
Emmanuel Dreyfus writes:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:43:36PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > Primary bootstrap is now able to read a GPT inside RAIDframe.
>> did you also update documentation?
>
> We do not have any documentation specific to primary bootstrap.
> x86/b
"Emmanuel Dreyfus" writes:
> Log Message:
> Primary bootstrap is now able to read a GPT inside RAIDframe.
did you also update documentation?
Taylor R Campbell writes:
> jschauma@'s change did help clarify (1) and (2). Let's try to work
> together to make it better?
Well said.
I can shed a little light on some of the questions.
> 1. What is `arch' or `archived' supposed to mean? Who sets it, who
>pays attention to it, and
Valery Ushakov writes:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 07:17:52 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> Jan Schaumann writes:
>>
>> > Valery Ushakov wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 22:33:17 +, Jan Schaumann wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Briefly
Jan Schaumann writes:
> Valery Ushakov wrote:
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 22:33:17 +, Jan Schaumann wrote:
>
>> > Briefly describe the 'arch' and 'nodump' flags.
>>
>> What makes them special and why is that these two have to be described
>> here and not in chflags(2), where the flags are
"David H. Gutteridge" writes:
Thanks for the history and it is all sensible.
> "nul-terminated" and "null-terminated" seemed more common in man pages
> that originated from historical BSD sources, so, lacking any style
> guide, I inferred the lowercase "nul" was more "correct" as "BSD style"
Taylor R Campbell writes:
>> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:53:19 +0100
>> From: Roland Illig
>>
>> The term "null-terminated string" is quite common when talking about C.
>> In contrast, the word "nul" in "nul-terminated" always reminds me of
>> the character abbreviation in ASCII, which has a
Brad Spencer writes:
> What is referred to here is a specific ZFS idea and should not be
> confused with any sort of global notion. Specifically, ZFS, by default
> and in common use, does not use anything like a /etc/fstab or
> /etc/vfstab to specify where the filesets get mounted. It also
I apologize for failing to understand "zfs legacy mount" and incorrectly
associating it with how I usually encounter the word legacy.
I now understand that you meant to separate:
zfs's preferred path of having mountpoints stored as volume
properties, which is a different way of specifying
Simon Burge writes:
> I'm running with a complete ZFS-only setup with no legacy mounts. This
> is my basic ZFS layout (leaving out a few mounts that don't add any more
> value to this discussion):
>
> NAME MOUNTPOINT
> pool0 /pool0
>
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 25 18:41:29 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs: zfs_ioctl.c
Log Message:
zfs_ioctl.c: Drop WARNING that ZFS is under development
Following discussions on current-users@, it seems many
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 25 18:41:29 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs: zfs_ioctl.c
Log Message:
zfs_ioctl.c: Drop WARNING that ZFS is under development
Following discussions on current-users@, it seems many
matthew green writes:
> could this be done with include and "no foo" statement?
> eg, like sys/arch/sparc/conf/INSTALL does.
Maybe, but I'm not sure it will end up working. Right now we don't know
if any of the missing things will be trouble, and even if we do move to
include/no I'd like to
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Mar 5 20:30:56 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Approach GENERIC
When processed to remove comments, blank lines, normalize whitespace,
and sort/uniq (one line was previously
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Mar 5 20:30:56 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Approach GENERIC
When processed to remove comments, blank lines, normalize whitespace,
and sort/uniq (one line was previously
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Mar 5 20:18:39 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC
Log Message:
GENERIC: comment typo fix (spacing)
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.585 -r1.586 src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
Please
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Fri Mar 5 20:18:39 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC
Log Message:
GENERIC: comment typo fix (spacing)
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.585 -r1.586 src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
Please
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 19:01:41 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: std.xen
Log Message:
std.xen: Move towards std.amd64
(No functional change.)
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 19:01:41 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: std.xen
Log Message:
std.xen: Move towards std.amd64
(No functional change.)
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 16:02:11 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Move closer to GENERIC (NFC)
This is another step in making XEN3_DOM0 closer to GENERIC. It is
just reordering lines, adding
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 16:02:11 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Move closer to GENERIC (NFC)
This is another step in making XEN3_DOM0 closer to GENERIC. It is
just reordering lines, adding
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 15:58:50 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC
Log Message:
GENERIC: Tiny comment adjustment (NFC)
While making XEN3_DOM0 more like GENERIC, I noticed a few differences
where GENERIC was off --
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Thu Mar 4 15:58:50 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC
Log Message:
GENERIC: Tiny comment adjustment (NFC)
While making XEN3_DOM0 more like GENERIC, I noticed a few differences
where GENERIC was off --
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Mar 3 12:31:19 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Move closer to GENERIC (NFC)
This commit reorders some lines, and brings in commented lines from
GENERIC to reduce the diff.
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Mar 3 12:31:19 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Move closer to GENERIC (NFC)
This commit reorders some lines, and brings in commented lines from
GENERIC to reduce the diff.
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 18:10:31 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Fix pckbc console attachment logic
Copy PCKBD_CNATTACH_MAY_FAIL lines from GENERIC to XEN3_DOM0.
GENERIC defines
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 18:10:31 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Fix pckbc console attachment logic
Copy PCKBD_CNATTACH_MAY_FAIL lines from GENERIC to XEN3_DOM0.
GENERIC defines
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 18:06:12 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Sync VERBOSE with GENERIC
Copy the *VERBOSE option block from GENERIC, and prune the scattered
verbose options in XEN3_DOM0,
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 18:06:12 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
XEN3_DOM0: Sync VERBOSE with GENERIC
Copy the *VERBOSE option block from GENERIC, and prune the scattered
verbose options in XEN3_DOM0,
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 00:18:22 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/usb: ukbd.c
Log Message:
ukbd: GC some 20 year old code (NFC)
Long ago, code was improved to allow detaching keyboards that were the
console, but the old commen and panic()
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 00:18:22 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/usb: ukbd.c
Log Message:
ukbd: GC some 20 year old code (NFC)
Long ago, code was improved to allow detaching keyboards that were the
console, but the old commen and panic()
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 00:01:27 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/usb: ukbd.c
Log Message:
ukbd: Condition probe-time verbosity on USBVERBOSE
Previously, this driver switched on more verbose messages based on
DIAGNOSTIC. But, the messages
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Tue Mar 2 00:01:27 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/usb: ukbd.c
Log Message:
ukbd: Condition probe-time verbosity on USBVERBOSE
Previously, this driver switched on more verbose messages based on
DIAGNOSTIC. But, the messages
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Mar 1 13:52:50 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
amd64/conf/XEN3_DOM0: Add comment
This commit merely adds a comment explaining how XEN3_DOM0 ought to
relate to GENERIC.
To generate a
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Mar 1 13:52:50 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
amd64/conf/XEN3_DOM0: Add comment
This commit merely adds a comment explaining how XEN3_DOM0 ought to
relate to GENERIC.
To generate a
Jason Thorpe writes:
>> On Jun 16, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
>>
>> No, that is definitively not OK, which is what the PR is about.
>>
>> It is not OK for a regular atf run to cause a reboot of the test machine
>> though, so this is a temporary hack around the issue (and
Great to hear of progress.
I don't see why we don't care about 8. Given our release policy, that
is supported until 10 is released.
Generally speaking divergence with upstream is a problem and we lost
these changes anyway in pkgsrc and every standalone GNU toolchain copy.
Agreed that divergence is a problem, but so is having bugs. It's a
question of the right balance in each case.
Finding a creative way to make this at
Greg Troxel writes:
> It seem really obvious to me, and obvious that it is netbsd consensus,
> that a tool that needs tmp (without needing persistence) should default
> to /tmp. So I think it's unreasonable to follow upstream here, and
> unreasonable to ask everybody to either
Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> On 26.03.2020 15:01, Martin Husemann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:57:40PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> The build of tools could be fixed independently.
>> The problem is that we build the whole system with the tools gcc, and that
>> gcc misbehaves (or so
Taylor R Campbell writes:
>> Do we insist on this patch? Can we remove it from local sources?
>
> We should keep the change. There is no semantic justification for
> putting build-time temporary files in the directory for temporary
> files that are meant to persist across reboot. These
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Mar 25 18:08:34 UTC 2020
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/sys: fdatasync.2
src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c
Log Message:
Relax fdatasync restriction that fd be writable
The restriction that a fd passed to fdatasync(2) must be
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Mar 25 18:08:34 UTC 2020
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/sys: fdatasync.2
src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c
Log Message:
Relax fdatasync restriction that fd be writable
The restriction that a fd passed to fdatasync(2) must be
J. Hannken-Illjes writes:
>> Forgot to add in the commit log, the changes have been pulled in from
>> upstream openzfs.
>>
>> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/928e8ad47d3478a3d5d01f0dd6ae74a9371af65e#diff-9fd6b453f8153161abe0728c449e6505R4386
>
> This is NOT our upstream --
This seems to
Warner Losh writes:
> Just a quick note: when FreeBSD when from 9 to 10, we had to play 'hunt the
> wumpus' for all the autoconfig scripts that suddenly thought they were
> configuring for FreeBSD 1.0.
>
> If you can arrange it, it might make sense to do a pkgsrc run on an
> experimental system
Martin Husemann writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Well, we are coming up on a year since netbsd-9 was branched, or at
>> least will arrive there before this discussion resolves. So cutting
>> -10 before we hit 100 works for me :-)
Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> On 23.12.2019 01:54, Roy Marples wrote:
>> On 22/12/2019 22:24, Andrew Doran wrote:
>>> NetBSD 9.99.29 - struct mount changed.
>>
>> Just curious - does our build software cope with 3 digit for the last
>> number?
>>
>> Roy
>
> At least from the __NetBSD_Version__
David Brownlee writes:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 21:05, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>
>> The first issue is that I prefer to have tar respect existing
>> symlinks (ones that it did not create by default -- without having
>> to specify extra flags) since to do this (in my opinion) does not
>> pose a
m...@netbsd.org writes:
> These seem to be lowercase versions of the same names. We're going to
> have trouble with the people who use case insensitive filesystems and
> CVS.
With any luck the multicase stuff is just dups to prune and not useful.
> (Or maybe it's not so bad because they're
Martin Husemann writes:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:09:19PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> In addition, I don't like it that images have stuff in /boot in the DOS
>> partition that can't be found in some obvious place, like /usr/mdec.
>> But I haven't gotten around to trying
Andreas Gustafsson writes:
> I really don't like the general idea of introducing differences
> between images and systems installed through sysinst. It's confusing
> for users, and also means that testing of one is less likely to apply
> to the other.
Agreed strongly.
In addition, I don't
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Jul 29 17:53:20 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/etc: MAKEDEV.tmpl
Log Message:
MAKEDEV.tmpl: Create nodes for 16 USB hubs
As proposed on current-users, but with better formatting.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Jul 29 17:53:20 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/etc: MAKEDEV.tmpl
Log Message:
MAKEDEV.tmpl: Create nodes for 16 USB hubs
As proposed on current-users, but with better formatting.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Jul 29 12:07:57 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/ic: mfi.c
Log Message:
sys/dev/ic/mfi.c: Add missing break in switch
(The entire switch is guarded by MFI_DEBUG and is known not to build.)
Reported by Oskar.
To generate a
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Jul 29 12:07:57 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/ic: mfi.c
Log Message:
sys/dev/ic/mfi.c: Add missing break in switch
(The entire switch is guarded by MFI_DEBUG and is known not to build.)
Reported by Oskar.
To generate a
Thomas Klausner writes:
> P.S.: The file is 44k, so I'm not convinced by the "/ is small"
> argument. ;)
100 * 44k is 4400k :-) The / and /usr distinction is longstanding, I
don't think we should give up on it easily.
Ryota Ozaki writes:
>> And, if someone is inclined, having better checks with meaurable
>> slowdown under DEBUG sounds ok too, but my revised understanding is
>> unclear on whether that's helpful. (But I am only trying to keep
>> performance under DIAGNOSTIC high; I am unconcerned about DEBUG
Ryota Ozaki writes:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:31 AM Jason Thorpe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 13, 2019, at 7:17 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> >
>> > 2) Your option 2 seems to involve two things at once:
>> >
>> > - migrat
Ryota Ozaki writes:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:49 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>> >> I'm sorry for delaying this task. Finally I have benchmarked a revised
>> >> patch
>> >> (our benchmarking setups have been out of service for a couple of
>> >
Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> On 08.05.2019 11:34, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:49 PM Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 19.04.2019 11:41, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
>> On 19. Apr 2019, at 03:52, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
matthew green writes:
> (i wouldn't pick 'wheel' as this group -- i would invent a
> new group either called 'net' or 'wpa', with no underscore
> since they're designed to be assigned, unlike the groups
> for specific programs security models.)
Are you saying that you are ok with the following:
Jason Thorpe writes:
>> On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:21 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> Even if you have to be root, these changes are still hugely useful.
>> "sudo wpa_cli" is not that hard, even if it seems like it should not be
>> necessary.
>
> ...but
Roy Marples writes:
> On 13/01/2019 10:20, matthew green wrote:
>> shouldn't one need to be root to modify network configuration?
>> i shouldn't be able to tell wpa_supplicant to do something as
>> non-root, in a default install.
>
> In a default install the only member of wheel is root and
>
matthew green writes:
>> In short, this is because -munaligned-access is enabled on ARMv6+ by
>> default for GCC. As the unaligned memory access is forbidden in the
>> supervisor mode unlike in the user mode, we need to explicitly specify
>> -mno-unaligned-access for kernel on ARMv6+.
>
> i
matthew green writes:
> Nick Hudson writes:
>> On 13/11/2018 08:21, matthew green wrote:
>> >> Modified Files:
>> >> src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: std.generic64
>> >>
>> >> Log Message:
>> >> turn on MODULAR by default on aarch64
>> >
>> > optional things should not be in "std.foo". that should
Greg Troxel writes:
> "Herbert J. Skuhra" writes:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2018 22:41:12 +0100, "Nick Hudson" wrote:
>>>
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: skrll
>>> Date: Sun Nov 4 21:41:12 UTC 20
"Herbert J. Skuhra" writes:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2018 22:41:12 +0100, "Nick Hudson" wrote:
>>
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:skrll
>> Date:Sun Nov 4 21:41:12 UTC 2018
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/etc/etc.evbarm: Makefile.inc
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Only add
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:32:01 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: RPI
Log Message:
RPI: remove commented-out pseudodevices
Remove a number of commented out pseudodevice lines that are
duplicative with GENERIC.common.
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:32:01 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: RPI
Log Message:
RPI: remove commented-out pseudodevices
Remove a number of commented out pseudodevice lines that are
duplicative with GENERIC.common.
m...@netbsd.org writes:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:57:07PM +, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
>> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ The licenses currently used are:
>> mpl Mozilla Public license.
>> https://opensource.org/licenses/MPL-2.0
>>
>> +nvidia-firmware NVIDIA
Manuel Bouyer writes:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 02:39:47PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> > Actually I did suggest to make the default dependant on MODULAR.
>>
>> what's the point exactly?
>
> that if I build a non-modular kernel with an emulation option explicitely
>
Nick Hudson writes:
> On 09/10/16 16:46, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:jakllsch
>> Date:Sat Sep 10 15:46:36 UTC 2016
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/dev/usb: usbdevices.config
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Make
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Sat Mar 19 23:21:03 UTC 2016
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/alpha/conf: GENERIC
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC XEN3_DOM0
src/sys/arch/cats/conf: GENERIC
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: HDL_G HPT5325 SHEEVAPLUG
"David A. Holland" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: dholland
> Date: Thu Dec 31 10:18:00 UTC 2015
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libutil: t_parsedate.c
>
> Log Message:
> When evaluated on a Sunday, "next Sunday" means 7 days in the future,
>
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> In article <20151210081103.e0fbbf...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
>>-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>Module Name: src
>>Committed By: knakahara
>>Date: Thu Dec 10 08:11:03 UTC 2015
>>
>>Modified Files:
>>
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Nov 2 00:51:18 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/dist/gcc: Makefile.in
src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc: Makefile.in
Log Message:
Use -f with cp.
When the source tree is 444 (as should be unremarkable),
Module Name:src
Committed By: gdt
Date: Mon Nov 2 00:51:18 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/external/gpl3/gcc.old/dist/gcc: Makefile.in
src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc: Makefile.in
Log Message:
Use -f with cp.
When the source tree is 444 (as should be unremarkable),
chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> On Sep 25, 9:30am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
> -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/lib/libdtrace/common
>
> | when you sync things, can you also include what version you sunc with?
> | so for the next person to
Michael van Elst mlel...@netbsd.org writes:
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev: dksubr.c
Log Message:
warn about labels only when built with DIAGNOSTIC
This feels like an abuse of DIAGNOSTIC, which is supposed to be about
asserts for detecting internal inconsistencies, not changing the
Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp writes:
joerg@ wrote:
Please don't commit untested and broken fix.
Please file a PR instead if you can't test it.
I agree with Christos that leaving the build broken is worse. The
alternative band aids are much more involved, too. That shouldn't
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de writes:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:07:32AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
A broken build is evidence that the prior commits were not tested,
and thus need fixing. Objecting to fixing the build without testing
should be a far lower priority than
S.P.Zeidler s...@netbsd.org writes:
Thus wrote Paul Goyette (p...@vps1.whooppee.com):
At the very les, if we're going to have these acronyms, they should be
listed in a separate file which is not searched by default. Similar to what
is done with fortune(6).
But that might not serve to
Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com writes:
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015, Martin Husemann wrote:
Anything that has no PCI.
Could we rename LEGACY to something more descriptive? The problem
with the name LEGACY is that it leaves people wondering whether or
not particular hardware is old enough to be
David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk writes:
I'm also not sure we need a new kernel config. It seems the systems of
interest are limited to 486 machines without PCI (and thus EISA
probably), and that's a pretty narrow window around 1993-1994. So
leaving the lines commented out with a comment
Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org writes:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 07:28:37AM +, matthew green wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:mrg
Date:Sat Mar 7 07:28:37 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/distrib/notes/i386: contents
src/etc/etc.i386:
Martin Husemann mar...@duskware.de writes:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 08:13:17AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
Will LEGACY be built by default?
I would vote no on that one.
What's the set of computers that one has to use LEGACY on?
Anything that has no PCI.
That sounds ok, then.
Is it just
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through tech-userlevel,
we should institute a rule to do so. To my knowledge we don't have yet
such a rule. We already have the rest of the p* programs which originated
in Solaris, we were missing this
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's a
bloat or necessary question, not because of risk of breakage.
Sure. So how much bloat is pwait? Is it a huge piece of software
or a small utility? I think that matters a bit.
Posting a note
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo