Marc Balmer <m...@msys.ch> writes: > Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel: >> >> chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes: >> >>> If we want to make every single change to go through >>> tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my >>> knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already have the rest >>> of the p* programs which originated in Solaris, we were missing >>> this one, so it made sense to me to add it. >> >> We do sort of have a rule, which is that significant changes need >> discussion. I would say adding programs to base always counts. >> Other than that, it's trickier, but if there's a reasonable >> likelihood of a valid objection, I'd say it's over the line into >> signficant/discuss. > > Adding new stuff bears a low risk of breaking existing stuff, so I > think it does not need discussion all the time.
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's a "bloat or necessary" question, not because of risk of breakage.
pgpSkT3o7R8yK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
