On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
| The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged.
| So that should reverted :)
Test it. Build a DEBUG kernel and when it works, you can or I will revert it.
In this case it
On May,Monday 9 2011, at 1:55 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: njoly
Date: Mon May 9 11:55:34 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi
Log Message:
Small typo (perfuse.debug - perfused.debug).
I'm getting this error with sources
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
I'm getting this error with sources updated couple of minutes ago
=== 24 extra files in DESTDIR =
Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist.
File is obsolete or flist is out of date ?
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
I'm getting this error with sources updated couple of minutes ago
=== 24 extra files in DESTDIR =
Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist.
File
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p
Hopefully not...
- Jukka.
On May 9, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
| The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged.
| So that should reverted :)
Test it. Build a DEBUG kernel and
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:36:02PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
I think get rid of the perfuse guard keyword - it may be that I
misled people with my post to tech-userlevel, sorry, since the
examples I used had the guard in place; however none of the other
puffs-based entries use any guards
Hmm I have already added MKPERFUSE so please revert mine commits or yours :).
On May,Monday 9 2011, at 7:13 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: manu
Date: Mon May 9 17:13:21 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/base: ad.mips64eb
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:57:46PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
Hmm I have already added MKPERFUSE so please revert mine commits or yours :).
Please also document these MKVOODOOS.
I have a gut feeling that half of these won't even build...
- Jukka.
On May 9, 10:23am, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
|
| On May 9, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
|
| On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
| -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
| =20
| | The
In message 20110509170006.GA15831@marx.bitnet
on Mon, 9 May 2011 20:00:06 +0300,
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p
lint(1) support them?
Hopefully not...
Me, too.
--
On May 9, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| Been doing DEBUG builds with tmpfs for a long time with no problems.
|
| In this case it thinks that i is used out of the loop.
|
| Where? After the for loop, it returns.
Well, just add back the commented out #CPPFLAGS+=-DDEBUG in
On May 9, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p
Hopefully not...
For the kernel, for (int ... is allowed.
13 matches
Mail list logo
