> Module Name:src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Fri Apr 26 18:19:18 UTC 2024
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_bat.c
>
> Log Message:
> PR/58201: Malte Dehling: re-order sysmon initialization before acpi
> registration, to avoid needing to call to
"Jason R Thorpe" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Sat Jan 16 01:23:04 UTC 2021
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/acpi: tpm_acpi.c
>
> Log Message:
> Match PNP0C31 as a TPM 1.2 device. Works on my ThinkPad X260, and
> eliminates the last of the devices that
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:14:18PM +, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: maxv
> Date: Mon Jun 22 16:14:18 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c
>
> Log Message:
> Fix memory leak. Found by kLSan.
> +
> + default:
> +
On 10/08/2018 18:11, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Fri Aug 10 17:11:56 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_bat.c
Log Message:
Don't hold up boot: defer acpibat(4) inquiry until threads are running.
ok jmcneill@
On 2019/08/05 23:06, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 10:12:04AM +, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:msaitoh
>> Date:Mon Aug 5 10:12:04 UTC 2019
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_ec.c
>>
>> Log Message:
>>
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 10:12:04AM +, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: msaitoh
> Date: Mon Aug 5 10:12:04 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_ec.c
>
> Log Message:
> - Fix a bug that acpiec_space_handler() doesn't access more than
On 2019/08/05 19:12, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: msaitoh
> Date: Mon Aug 5 10:12:04 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_ec.c
>
> Log Message:
> - Fix a bug that acpiec_space_handler() doesn't access more than 64bit
> correctly.
Hi Jaromir --
This change breaks the build of the one kernel that includes this code
(evbarm GENERIC64) as intr_establish_xname is not an MI API.
Cheers,
Jared
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jdolecek
Date: Mon Oct 15 06:58:08 UTC
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:22:56AM +0100, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
[in response to acpi_intr_establish() introduction]
> Can we have acpi_intr_establish() accept the xname? It's very useful to
> have the driver name registered for "intrctl list".
The attached patch does it.
Can we have acpi_intr_establish() accept the xname? It's very useful to
have the driver name registered for "intrctl list".
Jaromir
2017-12-10 17:51 GMT+01:00 Manuel Bouyer :
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: bouyer
> Date: Sun Dec 10 16:51:30 UTC 2017
>
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 11:53:37PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 11:06:47AM -0800, bch wrote:
> > ...
> > /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c: In function 'wmi_dell_action':
> > /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c:234:16: error: comparison between
> > signed and
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 11:06:47AM -0800, bch wrote:
> ...
> /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c: In function 'wmi_dell_action':
> /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c:234:16: error: comparison between
> signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
> for (i = 0; i <
...
/usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c: In function 'wmi_dell_action':
/usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/wmi/wmi_dell.c:234:16: error: comparison between
signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
for (i = 0; i < __arraycount(wmi_dell_actions); i++) {
^
cc1: all
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:27:48PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jakllsch
Date: Fri Aug 5 18:27:48 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c
Log Message:
As we add a handler for the ACPI fixed feature button events,
ensure
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 02:55:15PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:27:48PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jakllsch
Date: Fri Aug 5 18:27:48 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:02:52PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
The current version does what I needed.
But what is that?
- Jukka.
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 03:04:27PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:02:52PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
The current version does what I needed.
But what is that?
Prevent immediate shutdowns because the button was pressed at power
up.
Jonathan Kollasch
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_power.c
Log Message:
Let's not be silly. Use a fancy if else to decide behavior of a bool
and hope cosmic radition doesn't create a third state.
I'll just say here, that I found a code generation
In article 20110425053021.afdbf17...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Jukka Ruohonen source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Mon Apr 25 05:30:21 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_cpu.c
Log Message:
Add a missing case value in a
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
Are there any plans for kernel equivalent to cpuset(3)?
Yes, there is kcpuset(9), see kcpuset_create() and friends. I plan to
modify it so it could be used early in MD code (when memory allocation
is not yet available) and thus unify random MD cpuset
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:55:07PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
Start to derive the percpu(9) (or per-domain) state coordination
mechanisms by parsing the _CSD, _PSD, and _TSD objects by default.
This is quite interesting development affecting the whole x86; the sleep and
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:34:13AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
in acpicpu_cstate_fadt(). Note that this violates the specification, given:
PBlockAddress provides the system I/O address for the processors
register block. Each processor can supply a different such address.
The so-called wakedev code might be broken for a short while.
The reasons are listed below.
- Jukka.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:49:30AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Thu Feb 17 10:49:30 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:36:49PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
As explained in the new ACPICA documentation, as of ACPICA 20101207, the
_PRW methods are no longer automatically executed as part of the ACPICA
initialization. Refactor and rewrite the wake-device code to account
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
+/*
+ * sysmon_task_queue_cancel:
+ *
+ * Cancel a scheduled task.
+ */
+int
+sysmon_task_queue_cancel(void (*func)(void *))
+{
+ struct sysmon_task *st;
+
+ if (func == NULL)
+ return EINVAL;
+
+
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:52:57PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
1) There is a use-after-free. Hint: TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE().
2) It is not safe; while lock is dropped, the 'next' entry may also
be removed and freed. Hint: have a local list and avoid relocking.
Hmm. 2) implies that the
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:48:49AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Do not queue functions via sysmon_taskq(9) in the pmf(9) resume hooks.
There is a small and unlikely race when the drivers are loaded as modules;
suspend, resume, queue a function, and immediately unload the module.
On 09.08.10 07:00, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Mon Aug 9 05:00:24 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_cpu_cstate.c
Log Message:
Downgrade the currently supported maximum C-state to C1. There appears to be
timer-related
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:30:52AM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Log Message:
Downgrade the currently supported maximum C-state to C1. There appears to be
timer-related interrupt issues also in C2. With C1 it is guaranteed that
acpicpu(4) will not cause any slowdowns due stalled local APIC
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes. Instead of
attaching the unmatched ones, make the match fail. Do we want to
attach and do
In article 20100730072156.ga20...@marx.bitnet,
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:39:08PM +, Quentin Garnier wrote:
When the platform uses the APIC interrupt model, OSPM associates
processors declared in the namespace with entries in the MADT. Prior to
ACPI 3.0, this was accomplished using the processor object's ProcessorID
and the ACPI
On 19.07.10 02:59, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Mon Jul 19 00:59:32 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_cpu.c acpi_cpu.h acpi_cpu_cstate.c
Log Message:
XXX: If this is not correct, revert or fix.
This makes my laptop
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:32:58AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
This is a known issue. No clean solution exist in any implementation I am
aware of. The IDs may also vary between the processor object and MADT.
As I noted to Christos in private mail, the right solution is likely to
include the
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Mon Jul 19 00:59:32 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_cpu.c acpi_cpu.h acpi_cpu_cstate.c
Log Message:
XXX: If this is not correct, revert or fix.
This makes my laptop boot instead of panic:
panic: kernel
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:32:58AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
ACPI is silent about the CPU IDs in the processor object. In all three
Huh?
8.4 Declaring
On 03.04.10 18:29, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Sat Apr 3 16:29:22 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_bat.c
Log Message:
Update the limits when a change from absent to present is detected.
Does acpi_bat also detect the
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:39:54PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Does acpi_bat also detect the other way around ?
I.e. when you have multiple batteries you can unplug a full charged
battery and then re-plug an empty one for charging.
Yes, this should be possible.
(This change only fixed an
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Christoph Egger wrote:
On 03.04.10 18:29, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Sat Apr 3 16:29:22 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_bat.c
Log Message:
Update the limits when a change from absent to present
This doesn't sound right: if sysmon_envsys(9) functions are
specifically used in these drivers, then depending on header pollution
for the prototypes of these functions instead of explicitly including
dev/sysmon/sysmonvar.h sounds like a definite bug, not at all a
feature.
C.
On 05/03/2010,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Well, this is wrong in the sense that the _COMPONENT definition was
incorrect to begin with, and in the sense that we have explicitly tried to
recently add the _COMPONENT definitions.
Also: now it does BadThings(tm) if the memory tracking of ACPICA is
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:12:43AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Well, this is wrong in the sense that the _COMPONENT definition was
incorrect to begin with, and in the sense that we have explicitly tried to
recently add the _COMPONENT definitions.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:10:18AM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Thu Mar 4 03:10:18 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: smbus_acpi.c
Log Message:
Replace ACPI_FREE() with AcpiOsFree() so we no longer need to define
Module Name: src
Committed By:jruoho
Date:Sun Feb 28 09:23:30 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_lid.c
Log Message:
Cleanup:
* Semantics.
* Remove ACPI_LID_DEBUG.
* Reduce the amount of error reporting.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:16:38PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
i'm curious why ignoring the various errors is a good thing. in
particular, sysmon_pswitch_register() and pmf_device_register()
failure mean the device won't work properly, yet there is nothing
to indicate such...
Well, generally
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:10:18PM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Sat Feb 6 20:10:18 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: files.acpi
Added Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: smbus_acpi.c
Log Message:
Import my experimental
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Thu Dec 3 21:04:29 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c files.acpi
Added Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_pci.c acpi_pci.h
Log Message:
Enumerate ACPI PCI
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:54:19PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Thu Dec 3 21:04:29 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c files.acpi
Added
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:18:52PM -0600, David Young wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:54:19PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Thu Dec 3 21:04:29 UTC 2009
Paul Goyette wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Quentin Garnier wrote:
IMO, very few devices should attach at acpi, but autoconfiguration
should use ACPI data, when it is available, for the direct
configuration of devices that we would otherwise have to probe for.
Was there ever a disagreement on
Christoph - who wonder's why this discussion started after commit
instead of after presenting the patch on tech-kern.
partly, because you did not wait very long for comments. again.
.mrg.
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, David Brownlee wrote:
From: Jared D. McNeill jmcne...@netbsd.org
Log Message:
PR# port-i386/39671: panic while booting with an acpi kernel on a 790GX
board
If the firmware describes duplicate keyboard controller nodes, don't panic
when the driver fails to map registers.
From: Jared D. McNeill jmcne...@netbsd.org
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: pckbc_acpi.c
Log Message:
PR# port-i386/39671: panic while booting with an acpi kernel on a 790GX
board
If the firmware describes duplicate keyboard controller nodes, don't
panic
when the driver fails to map
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:15:45AM +, David Young wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_timer.c acpi_timer.h
Log Message:
Add acpitimer_detach() to eventually support acpi(4) detachment.
tc_detach() does not work correctly on a running system. It can race with
-
From: David Young dyo...@netbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:23 PM
To: source-changes-f...@netbsd.org
Subject: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi
Module Name: src
Committed By: dyoung
Date: Wed Apr 8 00:23:30 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:17:47PM +, Matthias Drochner wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: drochner
Date: Tue Mar 31 17:17:47 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi/acpica: OsdSchedule.c OsdSynch.c
Log Message:
avoid tsleep also during shutdown (and in
56 matches
Mail list logo