Hello,
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> hi,
>
> what's the status of this?
> in case it was not clear, i want you revert the changes.
It does not change the way how other (and older) section 9 man pages are
written, it rather makes our man pages consistent. And I strongly prefe
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, David Holland wrote:
> Entities that share the same memory space inherently have the same
> trust level. At that point it becomes a nonissue, except for e.g.
> cryptographic keys that should already be getting handled properly.
>
> I'm not clear what you have in mi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:07 PM, David
Holland wrote:
> All recycled kernel memory, including stack frames, is considered
> security-sensitive and not supposed to be exposed to the world. (Given
> that you're working on the security system, you ought to know this.)
> It is a matter of proper copyo
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:30:06AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>>> Add some common bus_dmamem routines to be shared by multiple
>>> platforms.
>>
>> Do these really need to be in their own private directory? (whose
>> name, I might add, is confusing in the presence of src/common...)
>
> This is in
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:23:39AM -0400, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Unrelated to the topic of the thread, but kmem(9) says:
>
> SECURITY CONSIDERATION
> As the memory allocated by kmem_alloc() is uninitialized, it can
> contain security-sensitive data left by its previous user. It is
> th
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:28:07PM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/mips/mips: fp.S
>
> Log Message:
> Fix a errant sw (should be lw) that ovewrites the saved [trap]frame
> pointer with a possibly bogus value.
Judging by the dates, this should be pulled up to
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:17:56PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:10:07PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > > I was thinking about that, too. I could add a 'name' node, too:
> > > >
> > > > net.in
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:08:00PM +, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet: ip_compat.h
>
> Log Message:
> build fix: caddr_t -> void *
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet/ip_compat.h
Why sho
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:01:39AM -0400, Elad Efrat wrote:
>>> Log Message:
>>> Build NiLFS(2).
>>
>> (2)? :-p
>
> That's how it's written in the configuration file...
That seems... odd.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:37:45AM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Wed Aug 26 03:37:45 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/gnu/usr.bin [matt-nb5-mips64]: Makefile
>
> Log Message:
> Don't make groff if MKGROFF is no
>
>
> To generate a dif
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:47:29AM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Wed Aug 26 04:47:29 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/evbmips/conf [matt-nb5-mips64]: MALTA32 MALTA64
>
> Log Message:
> Add no ath* since we have no Atheros HAL f
11 matches
Mail list logo
