Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs | The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged. | So that should reverted :) Test it. Build a DEBUG kernel and when it works, you can or I will revert it. In this case it thinks that i is used out of the loop. christos
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/comp
On May,Monday 9 2011, at 1:55 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: njoly Date: Mon May 9 11:55:34 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi Log Message: Small typo (perfuse.debug - perfused.debug). I'm getting this error with sources updated couple of minutes ago === 24 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/include/perfuse.h ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/sbin/perfused.debug ./usr/libdata/lint/llib-lperfuse.ln ./usr/sbin/perfused ./usr/share/man/cat3/libperfuse.0 ./usr/share/man/cat8/perfused.0 ./usr/share/man/html3/libperfuse.html ./usr/share/man/html8/perfused.html ./usr/share/man/man3/libperfuse.3 ./usr/share/man/man8/perfused.8 = end of 24 extra files === Regards Adam.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/comp
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote: I'm getting this error with sources updated couple of minutes ago === 24 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/include/perfuse.h ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/sbin/perfused.debug ./usr/libdata/lint/llib-lperfuse.ln ./usr/sbin/perfused ./usr/share/man/cat3/libperfuse.0 ./usr/share/man/cat8/perfused.0 ./usr/share/man/html3/libperfuse.html ./usr/share/man/html8/perfused.html ./usr/share/man/man3/libperfuse.3 ./usr/share/man/man8/perfused.8 = end of 24 extra files === All these entries have the `perfuse' keyword, which means that they will be selected for MKPERFUSE=yes builds only. But MKPERFUSE variable is not defined anywhere ... Do we need to add another optional component here (Makefiles will then need some tweaks), or should the keywords need to be wiped out from lists ? Manu ? -- Nicolas Joly Projects and Developments in Bioinformatics Institut Pasteur, Paris.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/comp
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote: I'm getting this error with sources updated couple of minutes ago === 24 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/include/perfuse.h ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/i386/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0 ./usr/lib/libperfuse_p.a ./usr/lib/libperfuse_pic.a ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libperfuse.so.0.0.debug ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/sbin/perfused.debug ./usr/libdata/lint/llib-lperfuse.ln ./usr/sbin/perfused ./usr/share/man/cat3/libperfuse.0 ./usr/share/man/cat8/perfused.0 ./usr/share/man/html3/libperfuse.html ./usr/share/man/html8/perfused.html ./usr/share/man/man3/libperfuse.3 ./usr/share/man/man8/perfused.8 = end of 24 extra files === All these entries have the `perfuse' keyword, which means that they will be selected for MKPERFUSE=yes builds only. But MKPERFUSE variable is not defined anywhere ... Do we need to add another optional component here (Makefiles will then need some tweaks), or should the keywords need to be wiped out from lists ? I think get rid of the perfuse guard keyword - it may be that I misled people with my post to tech-userlevel, sorry, since the examples I used had the guard in place; however none of the other puffs-based entries use any guards so best to get rid of it. Regards, Alistair
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote: So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p Hopefully not... - Jukka.
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On May 9, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote: On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs | The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged. | So that should reverted :) Test it. Build a DEBUG kernel and when it works, you can or I will revert it. Been doing DEBUG builds with tmpfs for a long time with no problems. In this case it thinks that i is used out of the loop. Where? After the for loop, it returns.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/comp
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:36:02PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote: I think get rid of the perfuse guard keyword - it may be that I misled people with my post to tech-userlevel, sorry, since the examples I used had the guard in place; however none of the other puffs-based entries use any guards so best to get rid of it. My fault: I did not ran yet another full build before integrating it. I will commit a fix ASAP. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists
Hmm I have already added MKPERFUSE so please revert mine commits or yours :). On May,Monday 9 2011, at 7:13 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: manu Date: Mon May 9 17:13:21 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: ad.mips64eb ad.mips64el md.amd64 md.sparc64 mi shl.mi src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: ad.mips64eb ad.mips64el md.amd64 md.sparc64 mi shl.mi src/distrib/sets/lists/man: mi Log Message: Attempt to fix build after perfuse addition (there is no MKPERFUSE) To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.47 -r1.48 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb cvs rdiff -u -r1.45 -r1.46 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el cvs rdiff -u -r1.120 -r1.121 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/md.amd64 cvs rdiff -u -r1.113 -r1.114 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/md.sparc64 cvs rdiff -u -r1.937 -r1.938 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi cvs rdiff -u -r1.582 -r1.583 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi cvs rdiff -u -r1.30 -r1.31 src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/ad.mips64eb \ src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/ad.mips64el cvs rdiff -u -r1.112 -r1.113 src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/md.amd64 cvs rdiff -u -r1.95 -r1.96 src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/md.sparc64 cvs rdiff -u -r1.1622 -r1.1623 src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi cvs rdiff -u -r1.169 -r1.170 src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/shl.mi cvs rdiff -u -r1.1315 -r1.1316 src/distrib/sets/lists/man/mi Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the copyright notices on the relevant files. Modified files: Index: src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb diff -u src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb:1.47 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb:1.48 --- src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb:1.47 Mon May 9 08:51:08 2011 +++ src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64eb Mon May 9 17:13:19 2011 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# $NetBSD: ad.mips64eb,v 1.47 2011/05/09 08:51:08 manu Exp $ +# $NetBSD: ad.mips64eb,v 1.48 2011/05/09 17:13:19 manu Exp $ ./libexec/ld.elf_so-64base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./libexec/ld.elf_so-o32 base-sysutil-bin compat,pic ./usr/lib/64 base-compat-lib @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ ./usr/lib/64/libpcap.so.4.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libpci.so.2 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libpci.so.2.0base-compat-shlib compat,pic -./usr/lib/64/libperfuse.so.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic,perfuse -./usr/lib/64/libperfuse.so.0.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic,perfuse +./usr/lib/64/libperfuse.so.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic +./usr/lib/64/libperfuse.so.0.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libposix.so.0base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libposix.so.0.1 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libprop.so.1 base-compat-shlib compat,pic @@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ ./usr/lib/o32/libpcap.so.4.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/o32/libpci.so.2 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/o32/libpci.so.2.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic -./usr/lib/o32/libperfuse.so.0base-compat-shlib compat,pic,perfuse -./usr/lib/o32/libperfuse.so.0.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic,perfuse +./usr/lib/o32/libperfuse.so.0base-compat-shlib compat,pic +./usr/lib/o32/libperfuse.so.0.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/o32/libposix.so.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/o32/libposix.so.0.1 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/o32/libprop.so.1base-compat-shlib compat,pic Index: src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el diff -u src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el:1.45 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el:1.46 --- src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el:1.45 Mon May 9 08:51:08 2011 +++ src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips64el Mon May 9 17:13:19 2011 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# $NetBSD: ad.mips64el,v 1.45 2011/05/09 08:51:08 manu Exp $ +# $NetBSD: ad.mips64el,v 1.46 2011/05/09 17:13:19 manu Exp $ ./libexec/ld.elf_so-64base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./libexec/ld.elf_so-o32 base-sysutil-bin compat,pic ./usr/lib/64 base-compat-lib @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ ./usr/lib/64/libpcap.so.4.0 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libpci.so.2 base-compat-shlib compat,pic ./usr/lib/64/libpci.so.2.0
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:57:46PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote: Hmm I have already added MKPERFUSE so please revert mine commits or yours :). Please also document these MKVOODOOS. I have a gut feeling that half of these won't even build... - Jukka.
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On May 9, 10:23am, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs | | On May 9, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote: | | On May 8, 9:21pm, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote: | -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs | =20 | | The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged. | | So that should reverted :) | =20 | Test it. Build a DEBUG kernel and when it works, you can or I will revert= | it. | | Been doing DEBUG builds with tmpfs for a long time with no problems. | | In this case it thinks that i is used out of the loop. | | Where? After the for loop, it returns. Well, just add back the commented out #CPPFLAGS+=-DDEBUG in /usr/src/sys/rump/Makefile.rump and build again. My MKDEBUG build causes that to happen too, and so it fails. christos
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
In message 20110509170006.GA15831@marx.bitnet on Mon, 9 May 2011 20:00:06 +0300, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote: So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p lint(1) support them? Hopefully not... Me, too. -- Takahiro Kambe t...@back-street.net
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On May 9, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote: | Been doing DEBUG builds with tmpfs for a long time with no problems. | | In this case it thinks that i is used out of the loop. | | Where? After the for loop, it returns. Well, just add back the commented out #CPPFLAGS+=-DDEBUG in /usr/src/sys/rump/Makefile.rump and build again. My MKDEBUG build causes that to happen too, and so it fails. Oh. rump. Rump incorrectly didn't use -std=gnu99. That has now been fixed.
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
On May 9, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote: So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p Hopefully not... For the kernel, for (int ... is allowed.
