hi,
> Because I don't want to change resulting binaries (*.o) for now. I
> think I'll "switch" these when cleaned up and merged and moved to
> sys/arch/x86. How do you think?
fine for me as far as this inclusion is temporary.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:17 PM, YAMAMOTO Ta
Because I don't want to change resulting binaries (*.o) for now. I
think I'll "switch" these when cleaned up and merged and moved to
sys/arch/x86. How do you think?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:17 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
wrote:
> hi,
>
> why do you need to make *.S include another *.S
> rather than
hi,
why do you need to make *.S include another *.S
rather than tweaking makefile?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: uebayasi
> Date: Tue Jun 25 00:27:22 UTC 2013
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64: vector.S
> src/sys/arch/i386/i386: vector.S
>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:22:34 +0200
From: Thomas Klausner
I tried 'make distribution' twice now, second time after completely
removing tools and obj dirs, but it doesn't finish for me. I see:
--- dependall-client ---
/lib/libcrypt.so.1: undefined reference to `__explicit_bzero
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:52:14 +0200
From: Alan Barrett
I think that the names explicit_memzero() and consttime_memeq()
are fine, but I'd expect consttime_memeq() have the opposite
polarity from consttime_bcmp(), because it should be answering the
question "are they equal?"
ode 1
I can't say I understand this.
/usr/src has no references to this left.
I basically do:
machine=amd64
UPDATE_FLAG=
today=20130624
sh build.sh -V DBG="-O2 -g" -V MKLLVM=yes -x -j 16 $UPDATE_FLAG -T
/archive/build/tools.clang-build-only -m $machine -O /usr/obj/src.$machine -D
/archive/build/$machine.clang-build-only.$today distribution
and my /usr/obj/src.amd64 was empty.
Ideas?
Thomas
On Jun 24, 4:35am, riastr...@netbsd.org (Taylor R Campbell) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/string
| Oops, that was silly of me -- the libc symbols actually have a double-
| underscore prefix, presumably meaning `these are internal; do not
| use'. Should I move the man pages to s
On Jun 24, 3:54am, riastr...@netbsd.org (Taylor R Campbell) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/string
|Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:36:29 + (UTC)
|From: chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
|
|I've objected many times railroading those in and casting the into stone
|
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:16:14PM +0900, Takeshi Nakayama wrote:
> Yes, I understand it. I just forgot to write "for now".
No problem - we need to review all MD code at that point anyway.
Martin
>>> Martin Husemann wrote
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:11AM +0900, Takeshi Nakayama wrote:
> > It seems sparc64's MD codes don't treat about kpreempt, so I didn't
> > care about kpreempt.
>
> Yet - but this will change.
>
> Martin
Yes, I understand it. I just forgot to write "for now".
--
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Discuss on tech-userlevel?
Yes please.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
From: chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
We should not be creating new interfaces based on obsolete ones. I'd
rather we have consttime_memcmp() and explicit_memset().
I don't care if we rename them to consttime_memeq and
explicit_memzero in
12 matches
Mail list logo
