Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:31:53 +
> From:"Simon Burge"
> Message-ID: <20210402063153.773c7f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
>
> | Add an XXX reminder to convert at(1) to use parsedate(3) in .
>
> If that's intended as an optional facility (at -d ... or something),
> then fine, but please don't make parsedate the standard way to input
> at dates (just as it isn't the standard way to set the date using date(1),
> it is way too fragile and cantankerous for something that should be reliable.
That's good to know about parsedate(3). I hadn't considered that what
looked more flexible could also be fragile and cantankerous :). I'll
revert that comment.
Cheers,
Simon.
