Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2019-12-06 Thread Andrew Doran
This is experimental: we use l_cpu to mean a number of things and this involves changing it to a different value than curcpu() in a running LWP, which we have not done before. I'll see about making it more robust. Andrew On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 09:36:11PM +, Andrew Doran wrote: > Module

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2019-12-06 Thread Maxime Villard
Le 06/12/2019 à 08:49, m...@netbsd.org a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:27:07AM +, Maxime Villard wrote: >> Log Message: >> Minor changes, reported by the LGTM bot. > > Would be nice if the commit message was "address some integer overflows" > or something. Except that it does not

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:05:05PM +, Sevan Janiyan wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: sevan > Date: Thu Dec 5 22:05:05 UTC 2019 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC > src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC > > Log Message: > Enable pciverbose option

re: CVS commit: src

2019-12-06 Thread matthew green
"Taylor R Campbell" writes: > Module Name: src > Committed By: riastradh > Date: Fri Dec 6 14:43:30 UTC 2019 > > Modified Files: > src/etc: security > src/etc/defaults: security.conf > src/share/man/man5: security.conf.5 > > Log Message: > Save the entropy seed daily

re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread matthew green
Martin Husemann writes: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:05:05PM +, Sevan Janiyan wrote: > > Module Name:src > > Committed By: sevan > > Date: Thu Dec 5 22:05:05 UTC 2019 > > > > Modified Files: > > src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC > > src/sys/arch/i386/conf:

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 06:30:55AM +1100, matthew green wrote: > > Why? I consider this totaly useless bloat, what was wrong with the boot.cfg > > solution? > > policy: no default modules in the installation unless licenses > issues force such, until module+kernel solution. OK, but this is gone

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread Paul Goyette
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Martin Husemann wrote: On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 06:30:55AM +1100, matthew green wrote: Why? I consider this totaly useless bloat, what was wrong with the boot.cfg solution? policy: no default modules in the installation unless licenses issues force such, until

re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread matthew green
> > > Why? I consider this totaly useless bloat, what was wrong with the > > > boot.cfg > > > solution? > > > > policy: no default modules in the installation unless licenses > > issues force such, until module+kernel solution. > > OK, but this is gone awry. The boot.cfg solution is great if

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2019-12-06 Thread Andrew Doran
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 07:12:10AM +1100, matthew green wrote: > > > > Why? I consider this totaly useless bloat, what was wrong with the > > > > boot.cfg > > > > solution? > > > > > > policy: no default modules in the installation unless licenses > > > issues force such, until module+kernel