re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage

2016-09-22 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Sep 22, 4:01pm, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote: -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage | i'm confused. the version we install has all netbsd-code and does | not use libbfd, and none of the code has gpl copyright. what part | of it is not gpl free that taints the whole

re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage

2016-09-22 Thread matthew green
Christos Zoulas writes: > In article <17305.1474483...@splode.eterna.com.au>, > matthew green wrote: > >> Added Files: > >>src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c > > > >bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source > >belongs in

Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage

2016-09-21 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <17305.1474483...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green wrote: >> Added Files: >> src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c > >bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source >belongs in src/external/gpl3. > >i understand that the

re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage

2016-09-21 Thread matthew green
> Added Files: > src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source belongs in src/external/gpl3. i understand that the version we install is bfd free, but the tools version is not, and thus the viral aspect of this becomes