Pascal Giard writes:
> Hi guys,
> allow me to be brief.
>
> As you might have guessed from my lack of activity on SoX's mailing
> lists, I'm terribly busy.
>
> I don't have time to dedicate to SoX right now and I don't see that
> improving in the next 4 to 5 months either.
>
> I'm sorry... :-/
Hi guys,
allow me to be brief.
As you might have guessed from my lack of activity on SoX's mailing
lists, I'm terribly busy.
I don't have time to dedicate to SoX right now and I don't see that
improving in the next 4 to 5 months either.
I'm sorry... :-/
I wish someone could step up to give a h
Eric Wong writes:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> I found a fix to this problem by adding lsx_error and lsx_flush
> to the regular expression (and I needed to "make clean" before
> rebuilding, so there's likely still a smaller build problem there).
>
> Pushed to the "ew/dyn-default-fix" branch on git://80x24.or
Hi Pascal,
I found a fix to this problem by adding lsx_error and lsx_flush
to the regular expression (and I needed to "make clean" before
rebuilding, so there's likely still a smaller build problem there).
Pushed to the "ew/dyn-default-fix" branch on git://80x24.org/sox
(as well as my "pu" (propo
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Pascal Giard wrote:
>>
>>
>> > lsx_error is referenced by that flac.lo and symbol should be in
>> > libsox.la
>> > (from format_i.o) that is listed right after it... so sounds like a
>> > badly
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Pascal Giard wrote:
>
> > lsx_error is referenced by that flac.lo and symbol should be in
> libsox.la
> > (from format_i.o) that is listed right after it... so sounds like a badly
> > generated libsox.
>
> Hmm.. I'll have to carefully check again.
> Trying from a
Hi Chris!
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
> Nothing jumps out at me other to to verify you reran autoreconf since I
> notice you've shown verbose output and now you have to go out of your way
> with 'make V=1' to see that libtool line.
I did go out of my way as I was tryin
Nothing jumps out at me other to to verify you reran autoreconf since I
notice you've shown verbose output and now you have to go out of your way
with 'make V=1' to see that libtool line.
lsx_error is referenced by that flac.lo and symbol should be in libsox.la
(from format_i.o) that is listed rig
Wanting to test the timestamp removal pushing committing the changes,
I first tried to build the master branch.
However, it fails with the following:
$ /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --silent --mode=link gcc
-Wtraditional-conversion -g -O2 -fstack-protector -Wall -W
-Wmissing-prototypes -
