Jan Stary writes:
> On Aug 11 15:29:17, m...@mansr.com wrote:
>> > Can we also remove the ancient broken VS projects please?
>>
>> Of course.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/u/janstary/sox/ci/msvc/tree/
Oh, I had already done the delete on my machine.
--
Måns Rullgård
__
On Aug 11 15:29:17, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> > Can we also remove the ancient broken VS projects please?
>
> Of course.
https://sourceforge.net/u/janstary/sox/ci/msvc/tree/
Jan
___
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.
Jan Stary writes:
> On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
>> In the SoX tree, there are currently support files for autotools, CMake,
>> and two ancient versiona of Visual Studio.
>>
>> Out of the box, the CMake build fails, but with the right options it
>> completes successfully, for now.
On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> In the SoX tree, there are currently support files for autotools, CMake,
> and two ancient versiona of Visual Studio.
>
> Out of the box, the CMake build fails, but with the right options it
> completes successfully, for now. The Visual Studio projects
IMO without really knowing who uses SoX the most, it's really a shot in the
dark.
Personally, I think CMake is a way more capable system. But if the
developers of
SoX prefer Autotools, then go with that. Whoever contributes the most to
the project
should really have the final say, if you're not mak
ma...@riseup.net writes:
> Hi all,
>
> the CMake builds fails for you? I just tested it on Windows and WSL and
> on both platforms the build completes successfully. As it works for me,
> I'm in favour of keeping it. Which options do you need to pass to CMake
> for the build to succeed?
It messes
Hi all,
the CMake builds fails for you? I just tested it on Windows and WSL and
on both platforms the build completes successfully. As it works for me,
I'm in favour of keeping it. Which options do you need to pass to CMake
for the build to succeed?
Magnus
On 2020-08-03 13:31, Jan Stary wrote:
>
Claude Warren writes:
> Would the new tool work on strange platforms like pi-zero?
I have no immediate plans to replace the existing autoconf based build
system. If you're having trouble building for some target, please
provide details so that it can be fixed.
--
Måns Rullgård
_
On Aug 03 11:38:29, cla...@xenei.com wrote:
> Would the new tool work on strange platforms like pi-zero?
It's matter of the OS, not the HW platform.
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:09 AM Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> > Jan Stary writes:
> >
> > > On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> > >> In the
Would the new tool work on strange platforms like pi-zero?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:09 AM Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Jan Stary writes:
>
> > On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> >> In the SoX tree, there are currently support files for autotools, CMake,
> >> and two ancient versiona of Vis
Jan Stary writes:
> On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
>> In the SoX tree, there are currently support files for autotools, CMake,
>> and two ancient versiona of Visual Studio.
>>
>> Out of the box, the CMake build fails, but with the right options it
>> completes successfully, for now.
On Aug 02 15:21:55, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> In the SoX tree, there are currently support files for autotools, CMake,
> and two ancient versiona of Visual Studio.
>
> Out of the box, the CMake build fails, but with the right options it
> completes successfully, for now. The Visual Studio projects
12 matches
Mail list logo
