Re: [Spacewalk-devel] %changelogs in our packages

2010-06-02 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:36:05PM +0200, Sandro red Mathys wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Cliff cpe...@redhat.com wrote: I'd be interested in knowing if there is any general guideline from Fedora for package maintainers that we would need to adhere too? I'm pretty sure the fedora

[Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk 1.1 preparation

2010-06-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I just edited Roadmap to better reflect reality. The last task for Spacewalk 1.1 is support for F-13, which will be nice to have. Jan and Jan (adelton and jblazek) are going to work on this and you can probably expect one week before this get resolved. Do you see any other blocker for

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] %changelogs in our packages

2010-06-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 06/01/2010 04:59 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: Hello, what is our position on the length of the %changelog section in our rpms? Now that we've released Spacewalk 1.0 and most core Spacewalk packages are in version 1.0, might it make sense to trim any changelog items for versions pre 1.0? Or

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk 1.1 preparation

2010-06-02 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi. I just edited Roadmap to better reflect reality. The last task for Spacewalk 1.1 is support for F-13, which will be nice to have. Could one also please take care of this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/spacewalk-l...@redhat.com/msg04640.html which is related to F-13 only? Best Regards