Sorry, I did realise part of this was OT for the devel list - AFTER I'd
pressed send.
Would AMQP get a look in for Spacewalk regardless of the ultimate future
direction of Red Hat? OSAD is still the most unreliable part of
Spacewalk/Satellite in my experience.
Will speak to our account rep
On 05/11/2011 10:05 AM, duncan.in...@virginmoney.com wrote:
Finally, is there going to be an open source project for System Engine?
Somewhere to discuss direction, development etc? Or will it be Red Hat
internal only?
https://fedorahosted.org/katello/
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite
On 05/11/2011 04:05 AM, duncan.in...@virginmoney.com wrote:
Sorry, I did realise part of this was OT for the devel list - AFTER I'd
pressed send.
Would AMQP get a look in for Spacewalk regardless of the ultimate future
direction of Red Hat? OSAD is still the most unreliable part of
On 05/11/2011 05:48 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 05/11/2011 10:05 AM, duncan.in...@virginmoney.com wrote:
Finally, is there going to be an open source project for System Engine?
Somewhere to discuss direction, development etc? Or will it be Red Hat
internal only?
On 05/10/2011 06:21 PM, Colin Coe wrote:
Please tell me that Satellite/System Engine isn't going to end up
looking line the new RHN...
The new RHN, part of the access.redhat.com client web portal is a
project being done by another team. RHN replacement of the future will
be using portions of
On 05/10/2011 09:57 PM, Colin Coe wrote:
Cliff
I know I'm going OT, but I can't help thinking that RHEV-M must be
tied in here somewhere...
There was several presentations on CloudForms:
http://www.redhat.com/summit/2011/presentations/
Carl Trieloff Red Hat Cloud Architecture
Bryan Che
Currently plans, yes, but it is dependant on prioritization of the teams
resources that I give - which is subject to change depending on what I
need the team to focus on within Satellite.
I've filed a BZ against this issue. However, since this issue effectively
makes Solaris system
