Hello Bo,
% but until it's done
% (consistently across all the pages) you should keep the old style.
%
% Then why to make the efforts tripple times? Let's sync it with the rest of the
% pages instead? You already agreed that the current way is not simple and, in
% fact, duplicates the
% Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% have to decide whether wait for it or not.
%
% OK, that sounds reasonable. Then I will make some more patches that will
% synchronize the rest of
Dear Spacewalk Community,
here at SUSE we are about starting development on a new feature called
Action Chaining, and we would like to try and get you involved from the
very beginning this time.
This is about scheduling a chain of actions on a server or a group of
servers, instead of single
Maximilian Meister wrote:
% I see. Then it should keep the original name so we can easily figure out
% where it came from and replace it with newer version in the future.
%
% Hi Michael,
%
% the original name would be pwstrength.js (in 0.5.0). We decided to
% use the spacewalk- prefix to
On 01/08/2014 02:34 PM, Michael Mraka wrote:
Maximilian Meister wrote:
% I see. Then it should keep the original name so we can easily figure out
% where it came from and replace it with newer version in the future.
%
% Hi Michael,
%
% the original name would be pwstrength.js (in 0.5.0).
On 01/08/2014 02:34 PM, Michael Mraka wrote:
As it's new feature in spacewalk I'd vote for using current latest
version of pwstrength-bootstrap.
Okay, I'll work out a new patch with the latest version in the following
days.
I understand it. In such cases where we need to modify upstream
