On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:57:25AM -0500, Jan Dobes wrote:
Nevermind, you don't have to fix it. I already corrected your patch and
pushed it to master.
Thanks. :)
--
Bo Maryniuk
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer
His entire
Hi, Michael.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
- SSM/Configuration/Enable: The message 'You may schedule rhncfg*
package...'
should stay above the date picker as it was originally.
Done.
- The original text before the date picker ('You may schedule
Hi, Michael.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
- SSM/Configuration/Enable: The message 'You may schedule rhncfg* package...'
should stay above the date picker as it was originally.
Done.
- The original text before the date picker ('You may schedule the package
Bo Maryniuk wrote:
% On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
% % Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% % because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% % have to decide whether wait for it or not.
% %
% %
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
% Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% have to decide whether wait for it or not.
%
% OK, that sounds reasonable. Then
Hello Bo,
% but until it's done
% (consistently across all the pages) you should keep the old style.
%
% Then why to make the efforts tripple times? Let's sync it with the rest of the
% pages instead? You already agreed that the current way is not simple and, in
% fact, duplicates the
% Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% have to decide whether wait for it or not.
%
% OK, that sounds reasonable. Then I will make some more patches that will
% synchronize the rest of
% First of them: the original schedule date picker on contains two choices
% - Schedule action as soon as possible
% - Schedule action for no sooner than: date select
% while new contains only
% - Schedule action for no sooner than date select
%
% Because it is the same thing: as soon as
Hi, Michael,
I am back. :)
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:43:18AM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
Yes, it's possible to simplify date picker on other pages
Of course. This is what we all want, ultimately: a simplicity and better UI.
but until it's done
(consistently across all the pages) you should
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
First of them: the original schedule date picker on contains two choices
- Schedule action as soon as possible
- Schedule action for no sooner than: date select
while new contains only
- Schedule action for no sooner than date
Hello Bo,
recently come across two pages - SSM Errata (/rhn/systems/ssm/ListPatches.do)
and SSM Misc Reboot (/rhn/systems/ssm/misc/RebootSystem.do) - which
you've converted from pxt to java. Both pages works fine but there're
small yet important differences between them and the other action
11 matches
Mail list logo
