On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:08:33PM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
Errm nevermind I had to re-add the pam_auth_service = rhn-satellite
line to rhn.conf
Did you lose this during an upgrade?
Yeah, I upgraded from 0.3 to 0.4 yesterday
Milan, maybe we could add an explicit
On Monday 19 January 2009 19:54:19 romain.peliss...@bell.ca wrote:
Hi,
I have testes the upgrade process and it fails with the schema upgrade.
Le log show :
'SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-0.3-TO-SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-0.4/156-RHNPACKAGE-COMPAT-NUMBER.
SQ
John Hodrien wrote:
A test box that previously had 0.3 installed on it has been upgraded to 0.4,
although when I say upgraded, I first tried an upgrade but when this didn't
look entirely right (kickstart profiles were causing the errors experienced
below and there was a spurious cobblered
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:08:33PM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
Errm nevermind I had to re-add the pam_auth_service = rhn-satellite
line to rhn.conf
Did you lose this during an upgrade?
Yeah, I upgraded from 0.3 to 0.4 yesterday
Milan, maybe we could add an
Kevin Arhelger wrote:
Hello,
I'm a lab manager for about 50 machines at a University.
My question is if I can use Fedora Core 7 Clients with my Spacewalk .4
installation.
I've found the src.rpm's for Fedora Core 9 and am in the process of
building them on Fedora Core 7.
Are there any issues I
