[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-26 Thread Neal Gompa
Something is seriously wrong here. Today, I woke up to the news that SUSE forked Spacewalk[0] into Uyuni[1] (which frankly, is a hard name to say...). The explicit reason they gave for this was that despite requests to the community to step up to take over the Spacewalk project, the current

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
well >> Best, >> Nikos >> On May 28, 2018 17:19, "Luca Menegus" <lu...@dbmsrl.com> wrote: >> Hi Neal, >>thank you for sharing this. >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Neal Gompa" <ngomp...@gmail.com> >

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:04 PM Duncan Mac-Vicar P. <dmacvi...@suse.de> wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > > Something is seriously wrong here. > > > > Today, I woke up to the news that SUSE forked Spacewalk[0] into Uyuni[1] > > (which frankly, is a hard nam

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:23 AM Florian Panzer - ratiokontakt GmbH < f...@ratiokontakt.de> wrote: > Am 28.05.2018 um 16:30 schrieb Nikos Zaharioudakis: > > Hi list > > > > Taking the news on Twitter there was some interesting discussion as well > > > >

Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:17 AM Florian Panzer - ratiokontakt GmbH < f...@ratiokontakt.de> wrote: > Am 29.05.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Michael Watters: > > Microfocus (who owns Suse) is a very litigious company [...] > ...because!? > I'm not saying "no", but also not saying "yes", I'm just curious

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [Spacewalk-devel] Spacewalk got forked?! WTF is going on?!

2018-05-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:41 AM Andrei Popenta wrote: > Proper support for debian/ubuntu would be awesome, indeed! > and of course, an improved way of receiving errata information, other than email lists :) I can't fix the errata issue. Debian and Ubuntu don't offer something like the rpm-md

[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk clients for Fedora 29

2018-10-31 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey, Can someone rebuild all the client packages for Fedora 29? Currently, it looks like things like dnf-plugin-spacewalk isn't available for F29 from the spacewalk 2.8 client repo[1]. [1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.8-client/ -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always,

Re: [Spacewalk-list] Ubuntu/Deb Support

2018-09-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:59 AM Randall R. Sargent wrote: > Hi all, > > > > **Newbie** to Spacewalk here. At the risk of beating a dead horse, has > anyone been able to successfully manage Ubuntu clients on 2.8? We have > 14.04 & 16.04 clients and it would make my life so much easier if I could

Re: [Spacewalk-list] python-hwdata: Build debian package with debbuild

2018-12-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:52 AM Robert Paschedag wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > someone has successfully created a python-hwdata debian package according to > the documentation within .../client/debian/DEBIAN-HOWTO > > I was able to successfully build the other packagesbut the python-hwdata >

Re: [Spacewalk-list] Managing Debian

2018-12-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:04 PM William Hongach wrote: > > Good Afternoon, > > I am currently managing RHEL and SLES within Spacewalk, but I would like to > expand this to Debian clients as well. I did some initial research and I > have discovered documentation that is either out of date or

Re: [Spacewalk-list] RHEL 8 client support

2019-06-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:40 PM Wilkinson, Matthew wrote: > > Are there any plans for Spacewalk to support RHEL 8 clients? > > Spacewalk client packages for RHEL 8 are shipped as a module in RHEL 8. -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! ___

Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk 2.9 clients

2019-04-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:56 AM William Hongach wrote: > > Hello, > > Can anyone confirm if Spacewalk 2.9 clients can communicate with a Spacewalk > 2.8 server? I ask because we currently have a 2.8 environment, but we are > ready to deploy some SLES 12 SP4 servers. The client available at >

[Spacewalk-list] Missing Fedora 31 client repositories for Spacewalk 2.9

2020-01-07 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, It seems we don't have client repositories for Fedora 31 for Spacewalk 2.9. Can someone please build the client packages for Fedora 31 and make them available? Thanks in advance. -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! ___

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: End of life for Spacewalk project?

2020-05-22 Thread Neal Gompa
Bringing Uyuni back to CentOS shouldn't be too bad. I'm starting with Fedora because there's a lot more stuff packaged there, and having a working state on Fedora is 80% of the work for bringing it to CentOS 8 anyway. Once I get it working on Fedora, then it should be straightforward to get it

Re: [Spacewalk-list] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: End of life for Spacewalk project?

2020-05-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:30 AM Andreas Dijkman wrote: > > Yes, of course, that’s completely understandable and fine and I don’t think > and expect SuSE is taking over the Spacewalk replacement development. > CentOS/RHEL/OracleLinux support would be really nice though :-) But as a > (hopefully