RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

2003-05-31 Thread Izquierdo, Raul
Title: RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users? Hi, I had the same problem. To see wich enviroment variables are configured I have executed an script into defaultdelivery that execute the system command env. I have discover that this variable is called $USER The only thing you must

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: Alex van den Bogaerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log? Q: Are my concerns about the logging shared by others? 1: lines aren't kept together 2: the PID might not be

RE: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

2003-05-31 Thread Tony Earnshaw
fre, 30.05.2003 kl. 09.21 skrev Gary Funck: As for picking up a stale copy of the CVS version --- I got that by going to the downloads page: http://eu.spamassassin.org/downloads.html And under this heading, Latest bleeding-edge code, 2.60: NOTE: these are built nightly from CVS. They may

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

2003-05-31 Thread Mike Scheidler
Mark == Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Mark [...] I think there is a tiny wealth of spam-classifying information Mark available from the set of recipients of a message. I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. My domain gets 20-30 emails every day for a guy who left the

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Larry
They could be using pound signs, and the MUA in question is deciding that that needs base64 encoding (obviously not the right thing to do, but there you go.) Any idea what the MUA was? Lotus I-Notes is what they said when I spoke to them on the phone. I don't know anything about it,

[SAtalk] config file errors

2003-05-31 Thread Monte Ohrt
Hi, I'm getting some errors after installing SpamAssassin. I recently installed Mail::SpamAssassin via the CPAN installation module like so: perl -MCPAN -e shell install Mail::SpamAssassin This installed version 2.53, everything worked fine. I then wanted to upgrade to 2.55, so I installed

Re: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:09:03AM -0400, Maciek J. Maciak wrote: I asked for constructive criticism. I can read. It doesn't work. Well, you asked which was better: editing files in /usr/share/spamassassin, or /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. The answer is local.cf, as specified in the comment

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Pearce
Hi Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed please let me know. I really need to get this working. I had the same problem. I am using a qmail,vpopmail, qmail-scanner setup SA setup, also with

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Pearce
Hi I'm using QMail and yesterday I compiled the latest version of SpamAssassin ! How can I configure it to block spam ?? I have no idea at all ! P.S: do you know a god virus scanner for qmail ?? I would recommend using qmail-scanner and the clam antivirus software, I've had no problems

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Thu, 29 May 2003 15:49:40 -0700 Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and to the

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
L == Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: L The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L encoding). How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich text, but it is sent clear. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
SP == Steve Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SP I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him SP on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just SP register his email address with pr0n sites all day... I've had the same email address since 1994.

[SAtalk] razor 2 support

2003-05-31 Thread Adam Denenberg
Does spamassassin check the mail against Razor's Database or just optionally contribute the mail it finds as SPAM to cloudmarks DB? thanks adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay!

Re: [SAtalk] Getting spamd to start on boot.

2003-05-31 Thread Thomas Cameron
Did you use the sample script called redhat-rc-script.sh which comes with the source? The top several lines look like this: #!/bin/sh # # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon # # chkconfig: 2345 80 30 # # description: spamd is a daemon process which uses SpamAssassin to

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

2003-05-31 Thread Upwood, James
Title: Message What is the default delivery file in my case? I'm using sendmail only as a mail "router", there are no local mailboxes/accounts or "rc" files that are processed, IE .procmailrc, etc -Jim -Original Message-From: Izquierdo, Raul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

2003-05-31 Thread Dr. Ongo
Hello if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it doesnt register as spam ?? hits = 1.7 should it be recognised as spam ? Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on

[SAtalk] Auto reply

2003-05-31 Thread fchibesakunda
Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... Frank

[SAtalk] Auto reply

2003-05-31 Thread fchibesakunda
Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... Frank

Re: [SAtalk] razor 2 support

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: Does spamassassin check the mail against Razor's Database or just optionally contribute the mail it finds as SPAM to cloudmarks DB? yes, it can check the mail if you have the razor2 modules installed. -- Randomly Generated

Re: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

2003-05-31 Thread Maciek J. Maciak
As for "doesn't work", that's not very useful. Have you tried "spamassassin -D --lint"? Is it using the /etc/mail/spamassassin area? Any errors from --lint? Here's the output from the above cmd, can you shed some light on why its trying to use /root/.spamassassin directory and files ?

Re: [SAtalk] spam-stats

2003-05-31 Thread Kai Schaetzl
DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote on Fri, 30 May 2003 13:53:33 +0200: Sorry if you sent me such extracts already, I should hopefully be able to read my email soon. No, I didn't, I wanted to ask first if you want them :-) I'm going to send an excerpt now. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany

Re: [SAtalk] USAGE - Mutt Bindings

2003-05-31 Thread Max Baker
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:03:20PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Max Baker wrote: First off, this thing KICKS ASS! Second off, Here are a couple more mutt bindings that might be useful to stick in USAGE for others to enjoy. (Near the X binding to

RE: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

2003-05-31 Thread Matt Yackley
Hello, Maciek Here is the line that I placed in my local.cf file for spamassassin bayes_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes So far it's working well for my site-wide Bayes -matt From: Maciek J. Maciak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:21 AMTo: Theo Van

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

2003-05-31 Thread Evan Platt
At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Hello if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it doesnt register as spam ?? hits = 1.7 should it be recognised as spam ? What version are you on? What were the hits? Myne scored a 4.3 with just the body (not headers):

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Chris Santerre
I completely agree that SA is incredible I'm not even using bayes! Here are my stats: 90% of marked spam is scored over 7 and goes into spamtrap! Not even delivered. I've had 4 FPs since Febuary! Stats per log. Totals to a month worth. -rw--- 1 root root 4.6M May 30 12:00

Re: [SAtalk] Auto reply

2003-05-31 Thread Evan Platt
At 08:20 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... First, look for a SendMail group. This is for spamassassin. Evan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on

[SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Keoki Kalune
TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP Keoki Kalune Executive Vice President The RK Group 408-942-8107 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rkgllc.com

[SAtalk] sneaky spam - new user

2003-05-31 Thread joe
hello all, I am a new user of SA and let me say it is excellent! I am receiveing a small fraction of the spam that is aimed at me now. One that is sneaking through uses a pattern which I would like to add to SA but Im not sure how. Could someone could point me to documentation for building

[SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

2003-05-31 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Our spamd stopped responding today (first time ever). I'm running 2.60-cvs from two days ago, so it may be a problem with the code there. I just wait and get another copy from cvs. But what I don't understand is this line in ps: 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd !=

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Thomas Cameron
Hi Keoki - You should probably talk to your system administrator or your ISP, whomever handles your e-mail service. The mailing list you sent your message to is for people who use and develop SpamAssassin. There is little chance that anyone on this list has anything to do with your e-mail

Re: [SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd != jui ] This looks weird to me. jui is a user on that machine. Does it mean spamd died when changing to that user? hmmm. that looks suspiciously like a sh if statement

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Brian K. West
Ok you need to contact your ISP you twit! They are the ones that use spamassassin to filter your email... So contact them bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keoki Kalune Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Keoki Kalune wrote: *TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP* www.rkgllc.com http://www.rkgllc.com/ Uh oh... sonic.net sounds familiar. ;) [10:[EMAIL PROTECTED] host -t mx rkgllc.com rkgllc.com. mail is

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Frank Pineau
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP Keoki Kalune Executive Vice President Nice. Executive VP and (s)he can't even form a coherent sentence. I won't

[SAtalk] Whitelist an expression?

2003-05-31 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
Someone high up in my company writes email exclusively in all-caps, utters countless profanities, and has been known to use more than five consecutive exclamation points on a regular basis. That said, his emails score ridiculously high on the standard spamassassin tests. I could whitelist his

Re: [SAtalk] Untrested relays?

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Mason
Gary Funck said: As it turns out, 192.195.190.1, is our incoming firewall mail exchanger, which forwards to our internal mail server. Couple of questions: 1. Are untrusted relays incorporated into SA's scoring? not a whole lot -- it can optimise RBL lookups by figuring that out, that's

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Mason
Alex van den Bogaerdt said: Q: Are my concerns about the logging shared by others? 1: lines aren't kept together 2: the PID might not be suitable to filter the information Q: If so, can we agree on a standard that makes it easy to find the information belonging to one message,

Re: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Mason
Kai Schaetzl said: Gary Funck wrote on Fri, 30 May 2003 00:21:26 -0700: I could've used remote cvs, which I believe is mentioned elsewhere, but this seemed easier. I'd say if this file isn't going to be kept up to date as the comment indicates, then the download link should be removed

[SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Jack Gostl
Forwarded at the request of Ben Johnasen. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:49:15 -0700 From: Ben Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SA List Ok, could you post this function request to the list. I really don't care how this request gets

Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis

2003-05-31 Thread listuser
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Mark wrote: MIMEDefang would, indeed, be an excellent place to implement this, as, on top of spamd, it gives you a bit of extra info on the SMTP session. :) Come to think of it, your implementation of this idea is actually a LOT better than my running a 'sec'

RE: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

2003-05-31 Thread listuser
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Gary Funck wrote: Matt/Tony, thanks for the info. and the nudge in the direction of the documentation. I tried out the CVS copy mainly out of curiosity. Based upon subsequent discussions, it looks like if I'm not in the development loop, then I may as well stay away. No

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread listuser
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP *sigh* Executive Vice President Typical management. The tie is just a little too tight. J

Re: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:21:05AM -0400, Maciek J. Maciak wrote: Here's the output from the above cmd, can you shed some light on why its trying to use /root/.spamassassin directory and files ? should i be That's where the user preferences for root live. pointing it to a different location

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

2003-05-31 Thread Dr. Ongo
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3 tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ X-Spam-Level: ** version 2.55 - Original Message - From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Mason
Jack Gostl said: Forwarded at the request of Ben Johnasen. Guys -- please stop. The mail is getting to the list. Repeatedly. However, nobody's replying because *we're busy* ;) The correct procedure for feature requests is to open a feature request bug in the SpamAssassin Bugzilla,

Re: [SAtalk] Getting spamd to start on boot.

2003-05-31 Thread AltGrendel
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 10:20, Thomas Cameron wrote: Did you use the sample script called redhat-rc-script.sh which comes with the source? The top several lines look like this: #!/bin/sh # # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon # # chkconfig: 2345 80 30 # #

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Larry
L The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L encoding). How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich text, but it is sent clear. You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way Apple Mail does ;-)

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Marek Dohojda
Well he does want someone to contact him ASAP, should we all just send e-mail to him? On side note, sure gets agitated poor lil' fellow. -Original Message- From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 30 May 2003,

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

2003-05-31 Thread Patrick Morris
There's something screwy with your installation. The MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE rule doesn't exist in 2.55. Dr. Ongo wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3 tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ X-Spam-Level: ** version 2.55

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Chris Santerre
Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s tempted :) -Original Message- From: Brian K. West

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Evan Platt
At 08:59 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Content analysis details: (5.80 points, 5 required) MSGID_CHARS_SPAM (0.2 points) Message-Id has characters indicating spam HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font face is not a commonly used face HTML_80_90 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is

[SAtalk] Combining 2 Bayes DB's

2003-05-31 Thread Louis Bohm
Is there a way to merge bayes db's together? I do not like the idea of having my two mail servers share a file system. What happens if one of them dies. So what I was thinking is that once a day (maybe more offen) I could merge the two DB's together. Louis -- - -- --- `,,``,,`` `Lightbridge,

RE: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

2003-05-31 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:21 AM 5/30/2003 -0700, Gary Funck wrote: Matt/Tony, thanks for the info. and the nudge in the direction of the documentation. I tried out the CVS copy mainly out of curiosity. Based upon subsequent discussions, it looks like if I'm not in the development loop, then I may as well stay away.

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Kelly Corkill
Same here, just because I'm lazy and don't want to change my email address - used since 94 - not to mention having catch-alls for several domains, other addresses currently posted as mailtos on the web, in old deja/google archives etc. None ever submitted to a p0rn site. I also use domain

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Frank Pineau
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Justin Mason wrote: The mail is getting to the list. Repeatedly. However, nobody's replying because *we're busy* ;) You're *supposed* to be devoting every waking second to SA development. If you feel the need to eat, we can probably rig some kind of an IV or

[SAtalk] spamassasin blocking delivery of mail from qmail queue

2003-05-31 Thread John McGivern
Hi Everyone, I had messages that if they were over a certain size they were getting delayed in the qmail local queue for days on end. I then read a post from someone saying that spamassassin was the cause because it was having trouble scanning large messages. They suggested lowering the max

Re: [SAtalk] Spam submission address (for tagging)?

2003-05-31 Thread Thomas Gramstad
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 23.05.2003 kl. 23.43 skrev Thomas Gramstad: I'm a power user at the University of Oslo (UiO). If you're a power user at UiO, it could well be that you're the one who could tell us all why pat, mons og goggins are still running Exim 2.12,

[SAtalk] iMS 5.2 w/SA 2.31 Razor 2.34

2003-05-31 Thread Kevin McKillop
Title: Message Hi all, I'm currently trying to setup SA 2.31 with Sun ONE Messaging Server 5.2hf1.03. I've successfully got SA running with iMS, I can check the slave debug output and see the calls to SPAMD. It appears to be working fine, no errors, but the scores coming back are always

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten-SOLVED-

2003-05-31 Thread Jon Reynolds
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 06:02, Mark Pearce wrote: Hi Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed please let me know. I really need to get this working. I had the same problem. I am using a

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-31 Thread Kris Deugau
Justin Mason [and a number of others] wrote: [snip a long thread about tracking messages through spamc/spamd] With all the talk about problems tracking spamd log entries, I'm curious why nobody has simply tried grep spamd /var/log/maillog and done some *very* basic sorting on the resulting

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread William Stearns
Good afternoon, Mr. Kalune, all, On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: Didn't anyone call the person? I did. I Left a message on his voicemail saying, essentially, contact your admin group or the ISP in question to get spamassassin tuned; the group of developers you've

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

2003-05-31 Thread Matt Kettler
Well, first, you need to realize that stripping the headers off completely invalidates sample-spam.txt as a sample spam message. SA gets a LOT of its score from the header based checks and the body rules are there to catch what the header rules can't. Which scoreset does your SA use? (ie: are

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist an expression?

2003-05-31 Thread Matt Kettler
Whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd should do it. It will bounce -100 scores to his messages. the _rcvd version will be somewhat resistant to forgery by checking both from: and received headers. You could also do a custom rule, but that's likely to be overkill. I'd only try it if

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-31 Thread Thomas Schulz
From: Tony Earnshaw tonni () billy ! demon ! nl We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the 21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no apparent reason. In

[SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

2003-05-31 Thread Ron Poserina Jr.
Can anyone tell me if there is a way to deploy an Outlook rule created to Outlook clients without manually having to create it for each user? I need to push out a rule for a SpamAssassin deployment that looks for a spam tag in the header, then moves the spam tagged email into a spam folder in

Re: [SAtalk] Combining 2 Bayes DB's

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:44:42PM -0400, Louis Bohm wrote: Is there a way to merge bayes db's together? I do not like the idea of having my two mail servers share a file system. What happens if one of them dies. So what I was thinking is that once a day (maybe more offen) I could merge the

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
L == Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: L The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L encoding). How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich text, but it is sent clear. L You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way Apple L Mail

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

2003-05-31 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Louis Bohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works wonderfully. We do twice that on a single machine (1 gig

RE: [SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

2003-05-31 Thread Stewart, John
Can anyone tell me if there is a way to deploy an Outlook rule created to Outlook clients without manually having to create it for each user? Well, I just created detailed step-by-step instructions *with pictures* for the users to set it up on their own using the Rules Wizard. If you do

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:38:59PM -0400, Louis Bohm wrote: I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works wonderfully. About the same

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread listuser
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s tempted :) Make sure

[SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

2003-05-31 Thread Stewart, John
Okay, I have a more specific question which I hinted at in my previous rambling regarding amavisd-new and SA 2.55: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talkm=105374227831594w=2 I understand that there appears to be no way to turn off opportunistic expiration in 2.55 (this is causing no

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-05-31 Thread Jonathan Nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread listuser
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Vivek Khera wrote: L == Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: L The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L encoding). How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich text, but it is sent clear. L You will need to ask

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

2003-05-31 Thread Scott A. Muc
Hi there, We are doing about 100,000 messages per day with a PIII 933 / 256MB RAM and IDE hard drive! The OS is FreeBSD and the MTA is postfix. We used to have performance problems until we implemented the -m flag to spamd, and changed the default rbl timeout to 5s. Now we have no performance

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

2003-05-31 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
-Original Message- From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:16 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire? I've got the bayes_expiry_scan_count left at the default (5000, I

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-31 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:38:18PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote: With all the talk about problems tracking spamd log entries, I'm curious why nobody has simply tried grep spamd /var/log/maillog and done some *very* basic sorting on the resulting output. I don't see why that Of course I tried.

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:16:14PM -0500, Stewart, John wrote: *check* the database to see if an expiration should be run. Is this expected behaviour? If so, what the heck is the point to the --force-expire flag if a new call to SA will cause an expiration check to run anyway? force-expire

RE: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

2003-05-31 Thread urbanbuda
The implementations of amavis I have seen rely on a seperate user for the Amavis daemon to run in. whatever this user is the auto-whitelist file will be created in is home directory as .spamassassin/auto-whitelist e.g /var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist, you can check this by copying the

[SAtalk] New doc: Postfix + site-wide SpamAssassin + Procmail for individual 'spam' mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread Greg Webster
Hello, SpamAssassin mailing list :) Some new documentation I've created. I'll be placing this online, but figured I'd post it here as well. Maybe of some use to people :) Please note: File locations are based on my own install. Yours may be different, and should be checked and appropriate

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

2003-05-31 Thread Stewart, John
Theo wrote: In 2.5x, if you're going to do manual expires, change the expiry_count value to something really large. In 2.6x, just do 'bayes_auto_expire 0'. ;) Okay, so I just set the bayes_expiry_scan_count to 50 (as Dallas suggested in his previous email, and you do here). No

[SAtalk] How can i tell if razor is working?

2003-05-31 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
Sounds dumb, but I've got the razor check specified in the spamassassin configuration file, and I've got it naming a specific razor file for sitewide filtering too only problem is, i can't seem to figure out if its actually running it or not -- anyone know how to tell?

Re: [SAtalk] How can i tell if razor is working?

2003-05-31 Thread Dan O'Brien
Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: only problem is, i can't seem to figure out if its actually running it or not -- anyone know how to tell? Use the -D (debug) option. If your running spamd (on Red Hat, at least), you can modify the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file to include -D in

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-31 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Tom, We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. [...] In each case, we had around 150 spamd processes running, with 2.5 GB of swap in use on a machine with 250 MB of memory! Each time I noticed that

[SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread Francisco Javier Lopez
Hi: I'm running SA 2.54 in a redhat 7.2 linux box with sendmail-milter. This box is a filter between external MTA's and a Exchange server. I have everything working (SA, bayes razor) and I was trying to use whatever spam users have in their mailboxes to train SA. So using a small VB

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

2003-05-31 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mike, Friday, May 30, 2003, 5:33:59 AM, you wrote: MARK [...] I think there is a tiny wealth of spam-classifying MARK information available from the set of recipients of a message. MS I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. My domain

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

2003-05-31 Thread Cassandra Lynette Brockett
I wouldn't mind seeing this implemented. There are many a system account that should never see email from outside - dependant upon the site that could include such wonders as root, administrator, sys, etc... So a blacklist_to line would be rather nice to get implemented, here we don't generally

[SAtalk] Test (Return-Path)

2003-05-31 Thread Ben Johansen
Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com -Authorized WiTango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm -Authorized Alt-N Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for

[SAtalk] Can I teach SA

2003-05-31 Thread jonr
I have a couple of spam mails that scored a 4.0 is there a way to tell SA that in the future this is spam? Can I use SA-learn or is that only for bayes type filtering or do I have to add it to a black list? Thanks for any help, Jon --- This

Re: [SAtalk] Can I teach SA

2003-05-31 Thread guenther
I have a couple of spam mails that scored a 4.0 is there a way to tell SA that in the future this is spam? Can I use SA-learn or is that only for bayes type filtering or do I have to add it to a black list? 'sa-learn --spam' will train the Bayes AFAIK. Train it, it will be very helpful. To

[SAtalk] OT: Business host w/SA needed

2003-05-31 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please excuse the OT. If there is a list of business web site hosts which offer SpamAssassin among their services, I didn't find it. (I'd be willing to host one as a small contribution to the community.) Needed: A reliable web site host for a small,

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread MaciEk J. MaciAk
I have kind of the same problem... I want my HAM to be sa-learned into sa but the messages are on a store other then the Linux box, and forwarding them will seem as if they are coming from an internal legit user. What format of file does sa-learn expect and disect ? -Maciek PS Francisco, sorry

[SAtalk] running sa + amavisd as diff user then root

2003-05-31 Thread MaciEk J. MaciAk
allright this may be a very basic question but... when i run' spamassassin -D --lint' and/or 'amavisd debug' i can run them as root and get accurate results ? yes if not how would i run amvisd as another user on RH-LINX -braindead tonite thanks (maybe Mr. Keoki knows)

RE: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Ben Johansen
Ok, I figured it out, sorry all for the Noise. the Return-Path header in the emails sent from the spamassassin-talk list is set to Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] so when I would hit reply it was going to spamassassin-talk-admin and not to spamassassin-talk I guess I don't understand why the

[SAtalk] Spamd not working anymore

2003-05-31 Thread Steve Wilson
The usual apologies about this being a newbie question and all that are proffered.. I've got spamd/spamc working fine on a RH9 Linux box with sendmail. I have it being called by procmail, and it works fine. I need to have a new email server, so I built a new RH8 machine and installed

[SAtalk] OT: Randomly picking X addresses from a file

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Shore
Since it's a slow night on the list I thought I'd ask an OT question too. It doesn't directly pertain to SA but it does pertain to anti-spam fun. Please excuse it nevertheless. Background: I have a text file of userids. It's has a very large number of userids. I can quickly append one of a

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:32:19PM -0700, Ben Johansen wrote: the Return-Path header in the emails sent from the spamassassin-talk list is set to Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] so when I would hit reply it was going to spamassassin-talk-admin and not to spamassassin-talk I guess I don't

[SAtalk] how do you prevent the X-Spam-Checker-Version header from beinggenerated

2003-05-31 Thread Robin Mordasiewicz
how do you prevent the X-Spam-Checker-Version header from being generated --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5

Re: [SAtalk] New doc: Postfix + site-wide SpamAssassin + Procmailfor individual 'spam' mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread Robin Mordasiewicz
could you describe an alternative scenario using cyrus On Fri, 30 May 2003, Greg Webster wrote: Hello, SpamAssassin mailing list :) Some new documentation I've created. I'll be placing this online, but figured I'd post it here as well. Maybe of some use to people :) Please note: File

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread Lucas Albers
Their is another potential method you could use. Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and learn the spam. http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/ You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap connection from the linux box.

  1   2   >