it at: http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
Bill
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http
very log lines that
need to remain on a single line and not wrap.
Bill
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5
The most appropriate response would be to demand Microsoft fix
their software.
That is about as effective as trying to catch your breath in a vacuum. :)
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open
-1mdk.src.rpm
-Bill Randle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http
are identical.
I know bigevil list is being used because I can see them in the reports.
Can you tell me which one is the correct location?
The one in /etc/mail/spamassassin will be used; the other one is
ignored. (I made the same mistake awhile back.)
-Bill
No Hosting Servers
No Email Servers
No FTP Servers
Just consuming.
My mail and web server generates about 10-20MB of traffic per month and is a
far far more secure connection than my neighbor's connection which generates
100+MB of outbound traffic per day playing online multiplayer games.
of the
exchange server, but
this was recommended in something I read and so far has been working fine.
-Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
Check-out amavisd-new, it can invoke SA and, based on the result score,
apply any of several different options, including quarantining or discarding
the message.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Cranson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 2:03 PM
Wow, very nice Bob! Thanks for sharing this with the list. I'll give it a
try this next week and see how it goes.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:31 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Mass-Check
Some people
://www.lacerate.com
You also have MSN joining in as a late comer perhaps intending to take over
the spam url masking world.
http://g.msn.com/1SUenus/CT?http://www.2026.com/F/index.html
Maybe they hope to embrace and extend this technique also.
We would appreciate a response.
Bill Larson
Network
) then restart whatever app you use to call
spamassassin.
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes
Abused url
http://g.msn.com/1SUenus/CT?http://www.Nicole.name-williams.com/E/4156.html
my url
http://g.msn.com/1SUenus/CT?http://www.compu.net
Rule to catch.
uri MY_URI_REDIRECT2/http:\/\/g.msn.com\/1SUenus\/CT\?*/i
score MY_URI_REDIRECT2 4.0
describe M_URI_REDIRECT2 contains url
- Original Message -
From: Martin Radford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Thu Jan 1 00:53:48 2004, jennifer wrote:
Bill Landry contacted me with some nice edits on Chickenpox. More
punctuation included (in addition to .), and the set is now doubled to
include the subject.
Bear in mind
Chris, check the uri BigEvilList_14 line, you have a couple of dots . in
front of the escape character \ instead of behind it. That's what's
causing the Illegal octal digit warning when you --lint the new BigEvil.cf
file.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED
Subject: [SPAM 50.63] Would You Like to Save Tons on Health Care? lilly
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:07:06 + (GMT)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up
considered it too aggressive (too likely to generate
false positives), so rather than import it into dnsbl.njabl.org, it was
added as a separate sub-zone so that those who wanted to use it could, and
those who did not, would not have it forced upon them.
Bill
You say you believe you changed noting important, but apparently
_something_ important was changed. What can you remember
about settings you
changed since it last worked?
One of the easily missed gotcha's is editing the file in windows notepad or
another unix-unaware editor. This inserts a
.
Although it will take wide support to make SPF a really viable spam test, by
including native support for SPF in SA, this would certainly go a long way
in helping to make SPF a more widely adopted standard.
Thoughts?
Bill
---
This SF.net email
- Original Message -
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:49:37AM -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
I was wondering if the SA developers are considering adding support
for
Sender Permitted From (SPF) in SA, as defined at spf.pobox.com? I
have
We have test
Comments and suggestions on this rule are appreciated.
full LOCAL_IEREDIR /[EMAIL PROTECTED](\/|htm|html|php|shtml)?/
score LOCAL_IEREDIR 150
describe LOCAL_IEREDIR Possible phishing/URL Masking attempt detected.
Bill Larson
Network Administrator
Compu-Net Enterprises
(931) 920-0043 or (877
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/malicious.html
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/malicious.html
returns http://www.trusted_site.com/ in the browser address line this can
be done with any website. It can also be done with a https site as well.
Any suggested rulesets for this one.
Bill Larson
the overall score.
Thoughts and feedback appreciated...
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash
.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Lasman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 11:11 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] DCC ? Vipul's Razor? skip_rbl_checks?
I'm using spamassassin version 2.55 with Exim version 4.24, as supplied
by the hosting control panel people
, or because you had problems when adding other punctuation
marks?
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn
set also.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Larry Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:49 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish
I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines of
gibberish,
such as:
lvwpdfobv
server and would like to set up a spam
corpus for the new server. I have several thousand spams saved in an outlook
folder. Do I need to extract each of those spams from the report or can I
submit the encapsulated report message? Will SA strip the added
headers/encapsulation?
TIA,
Bill
environment than dccproc, since it does
not need to be instantiated for each message scanned.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Smart,Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:57 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc
The DCC
It's pretty straight forward, just make sure that the config options point
to the correct directory and file locations for your setup. If you have
specific questions after you have done this, let me know.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Smart,Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yep, it was trademarked by Deersoft, and now owned by
McAfee following
their acquisition of Deersoft.
Crap! I hope McAfee does not get the idea to start licensing
SA. That would suck!
Now that the name SpamAssassin is getting to be known as the premier product
on the market you can
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_50,BIZ_TLD,CASHCASHCASH,
DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONT_BIG,
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
The message was not spammy enough to trigger SA. Your bayes gave it a
neutral value
If you don't then you can expect exactly this type of
activity from Mcafee.
Considering that Spamassassin is now the preferred spam
tool for ISPs, and getting some great press, they would be
stupid not to take this logical step soon.
Exactly my point! I have had dealing with their legal
it?
If so, how.
I sure hope not, since auto-reporting invites lots of false reports. No
matter how accurate you think your spam rules are, human interaction is
still necessary to validate and confirm a message is actually spam before
reporting it to a spam database.
Bill
Title: Message
It
would be easy to set up a procmail rule to move all tagged spam into a folder on
the SA machine however this is a very dangerous thing to do as falsely tagged
mail (FP) will never be delivered and the recipient has no way to recover the
mail. It is much better to just tag
IMHO, the best way to handle html mail is bit-bucket the message and send a
note to the sender that html messages are not accepted by the server and
include a link on how to kill html in their mailer.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM
Title: Message
Please
search the archives or RTFM, this subjesct has been covered dozens of
times.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike DSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:09 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk]
. This should
show both SPAM and SPAM-TAG in the mail log file. This will help
verify spam is detected and tagged at the requested level.
-Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX
1.101
1.001 1.001
will be ignored if you set different scores for these tests in your local.cf
file.
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free
I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge.
Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me?
---snip-
The virus checker has found potentially malicious code in a mail by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery has been stopped.
The recipient(s) for
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:17:54AM -0800, James Nonya wrote:
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1. I've been
running spamd just fine since 2.55 was released. I compile and
install SA 2.60 and all goes well. When I try to start spamd here's
what I get:
Insecure directory
I've read numerous antispam articles, and NONE have given SA justice.
I think the main reason for the poor reporting of SA is mainly due to the
fact that every one of the reviews has been done by a company that has an
agenda. That agenda being, collecting advertising funding from commercial
And now for the real world.
only 50 or less users:
Brightmail$ 2,998 for 2 years
FrontBridge $ 2,700 for 2 years
Postini $ 2,700 for 2 years
ProofPoint$ 2,000 for 2 years
SpamAssassin $ 3,100 for 2 years
That assumes that the small company
I don't know whether this is possible at SourceForge, but if
it is, it might make sense to turn on these settings once in a while.
Would it be possible for SF to release the entire subscription list to
someone, say the list admin, who could then generate the mailing run
locally? That might be
Sounds like you forgot to restart spamd after your change.
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
a spam message anywhere close to that
large so its a safe thing to do. Hope this helps.
Bill
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java
Hi folks.
I have exim4, exiscan and spamassassin 2.60
It works great, but not always.
Normaly SA does not report any errors, warings etc.
I use debian version (testing).
As I say it work ok, but when remote server send to me from
mail-daemon
(zmailer) (mail with HTML and
I added this to my Sendmail configuration a couple of weeks back, and I have
been amazed at how much SPAM has been rejected as a result.
I prefer to have Sendmail reject it at the get-go, rather than have it come
all the way through to SA.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering
I'll say. I have mine set at 4, which I have found (for my setup) is pretty
near perfect, even though it is lower than the default setting of 5.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This sounds like my earlier problem trying to sa-learn large mailboxes.
Others here commented that it must be a hardware problem, but my box is
fairly new with very decent components (built from scratch by me but with
good MB and memory, etc.) and nothing else I do, including using X, gives
it
The intention is to disallow any adsl, dial-up or
dynamic/static address on such lines to send any mail to this
server. I will have a separated smtp server for my customers... ;)
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
There are many many people running home networks in dynamic space who send
their mail thru
I want to block those selling [EMAIL PROTECTED]@, asian porn, and such
un-wanted material, which represents about 50% of the traffic
(pure guess). There will be some spam that will then be
easaly downloaded by our customers and then filtered.
Again, I feel deleting ANY mail addressed to
Simple solution
1.Spamassassins reads in the message
2. It then stores the original message in two variables
3. In the second variable remove all punctuation, spaces, special encoded
characters, foreign language characters, html including html comments, and
other methods used for obscufaction.
4.
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 11:49, Evan Platt wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:29 PM -0500 Bill Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received 3 identical spams from the same e-mail address that did not
get classified as spam. I tried to do a sa-learn --spam on the message,
and it said
I found a rule to check for white on white text to spot possible spam.
However, I am finding that spammers are not including the body color as
white since the email client background default color is white. Thanks.
How could you write the following rule to give the email a score if , body
was
I received 3 identical spams from the same e-mail address that did not
get classified as spam. I tried to do a sa-learn --spam on the message,
and it said it learned from 1 message, but when I tried to filter the
message again, the Bayesian filter says that the spam probability is 0
to 1%. I
filtering.
SA_OPTOUT_FILENAME=$HOME/.optout.spamassassin
:0
* ? test ! -f $SA_OPTOUT_FILENAME
{
:0fw
* 256000
| spamc
}
Bill Larson
Network Administrator
Compu-Net Enterprises
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
I use Sendmail with SA, but I do use procmail.
Do you not have access to the ability to install packages on your server?
Otherwise, youre going to have to
use the Spamass milter, which means youve STILL got installation to do.
Without the ability to install stuff on
your server, I
It isn't SA you want, it's procmail. The formail tool in the procmail
package will do anything like this that you want.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerhard
Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more
than 3 instances of i/i in each email to mark it as spam?
Maybe I could just score it lower per instance, say .2
There were 58 instances of i/i in this email and 63
instances of b/b.
A test that counted .1 per instance in a
I am running SA 2.60 installed from the RPMs on Red Hat 9,
on an AMD 2100+ based system with a half-gig of RAM.
This has now happened for the second time. Before when it
happened, about two weeks ago, I figured it was just a coincidence. Now, Im
positive that its SA-LEARN that is the
Definitely SPAM, and of a particularly nasty sort. Somehow someone is
snagging emails off the archive or some other way, and fabricating these
replies.
Bad business.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I know for sure if Auto-Learn is functioning
correctly?
It does seem to be working for SOME messages but the headers
in many of them say:
X-Spam-Status: autolearn=no
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Radford
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Bill Polhemus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Auto-Learn
autolearn=no indicates that this particular message was not learned
from, not that autolearning
Yes. In fact, I have a .procmailrc file that uses the ${HOME} variable among
other generics, and can be put in the HOME directory of any user. That way
the user can also add their own recipes if they like.
Oh, and I also have a /etc/procmail file that has some site-wide recipes
(it adds stuff
IIRC, it should be
Sa-learn --spam --mbox kill
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph
P. Wetstein
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:56 AM
To: [EMAIL
i use postfix with sa and procmail to delivier the mails
local to the outlook 2000 clients. my problem now is: how can
i report a false negative from an outlook client to sa? in
the faq i've seen the the posibility to forward the message with
(double-click to open the mail in its own
Let me guess: You're hiring hit men to track down and eliminate, not just
the Spam, but the Spammers themselves!
Then, you're going to invest in genetic research that will find the Spammer
gene and provide an inoculation for all the children in the world, to
eradicate any possibility that they
District, Beijing, China (100027)
country: CN
phone:+86-10-6418-5885
fax-no: +86-10-64182174
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nic-hdl: JM97-AP
mnt-by: MAINT-CNNIC-AP
changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020819
source: APNIC
Bill Larson
Network Administrator
Compu-Net
Yes.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Kinghorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules
I do it using a procmail recipe, such as:
=BEGIN PROCMAIL RECIPE==
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
{
# Mails with a score of 15 or higher are almost certainly spam (with 0.05%
# false positives according to rules/STATISTICS.txt). Let's delete them
# completely.
:0:
*
it.
:)
You don't say what version of SA you are running, but if it's 2.60, sorbs is
already defined as a SA DNSBL test. See:
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf
Bill
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference Expo
I cannot speak as an expert on this score, but my understanding is that a
combination of such Bayesian databases would likely do more harm than good
because the residual spam corpus that would get through the general SA
filtering would be very specific to the recipient.
That is, combining
I realize this is a Perl problem, but can anyone help me
diagnose this? I know next to NOTHING about Perl.
The following is an error message I get when attempting to run
SA from an email alias under Sendmail:
- Transcript of session follows -
Insecure dependency in
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 3:18 PM
To: Bill Polhemus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Insecure dependency in sysopen
Bill Polhemus wrote:
I realize this is a Perl problem, but can anyone help me diagnose
this? I know next to NOTHING about Perl.
Are you running Razor checks
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why?
Notice purposeful misspellings as obfuscations.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Begin Included Message-
htmlcenter16121g11n4m06a8a53594548b10126vx
291uqs7rz3xo63jl8w5ie14f3q3c3770brfont
I have wanted to set up a spam trap for some
time. First, I created an account, called spamtest, on my system.
Then, I went to Usenet and posted a ton of test messages to every
newsgroup I could think of (mostly the pr0n ones) where the address would be
harvested, and tried using the
.
P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Polhemus
Sent: Friday, October
17, 2003 6:26 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] HELP: Can't
Invoke SA From Sendmail Alias
I always use the SRPMs when they are available.
However, I have never attempted to build SRPMS myself. Is this difficult to
do?
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I think this thing about RH dropping their boxed sets is really, really
overblown. They will continue to make updates available, and they will
release new distributions. You just won't be buying them in stores.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
I noticed that if I try to feed SA-LEARN a mailbox full of
SPAM, it now craps out claiming segmentation fault.
Anyone have any ideas?
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
image001.jpg
Running SA 2.60, I am seeing the following in my procmail
logs:
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure
dependency in open
while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Razor2/Client/Config.pm
line 414, GEN20 line 1.
Can
) Segmentation Fault
--
Maybe you can
make the spam corpus available on a web page so other people can test if it segfaults
on their machine too?
JS
-Message
d'origine-
De:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Bill Polhemus
Envoyé:
15 octobre 2003 13:16
À:
[EMAIL
Okay, so I applied the patch as shown at:
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=showfile=faq02.006.htp
But I get the following message, STILL:
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure
dependency in open while running with -T switch at
Well, a follow-up:
I figgered out that I probably had to remake
and remake install, etc.
Which I then proceeded to do, and then *BOOM!* I get a compile error
on Razor2.
Bear in mind that I had no problem
installing it before. Further bear in mind that I even erased the whole
I am no rule coder, so I was wondering if anyone has a rule to catch
spammers that hide their url in their email. Here is an example of what it
getting through my spam filters:
href=http://w#101;#119;#105;#108;l#110;#101;ed#46;#99;#111;m/c/#1
05;r#111;#110;#46;#104;t#109;l?farrow=elrlnm
It
I implemented some of the rules others have posted on this
list regarding obfuscating text. Now that I am running SA 2.60, I
note that Im getting the following error message.
Failed to compile body SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
(Bareword i not allowed while
strict subs in use at
Kinda makes you wonder where the world is heading when more
email is junk than legitimate :/
I see the email world heading towards secure email. A world where you cannot
send an email until/unless your mailer software has a key installed that
validates all mail leaving your site. If you
Here's another one from a batch of several that have gotten through SA 2.55
over the last several days. They use the spurious HTML tags to break up the
text and get it through the Bayesian filter.
I'm running these through every time I get one--and luckily, there've only
been about one or two
I really would prefer to implement something as complex as SA through the
RPMs on my Red Hat 9 system. So far, they are only up to SA 2.55. That has
worked fine up until recently, when the HTML obfuscation has begun cropping
up. Perhaps 2.60 can fix that.
Any idea when those will be available?
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith C.
Ivey
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 9:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] More HTML Obfuscation: This One Made It Through
Bill Polhemus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They use the
spurious HTML tags to break up the text and get it through
On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:03 PM 10/10/03 -0700, Bill Shupp wrote:
How do I setup SpamAssassin to query only bl.spamcop.net, and set a
very high score for that? I'm using spamd with vpopmail support.
Go to /usr/share/spamassassin. look through
-- Message Text -
Here's one that I got today, that slipped through (the first in over a
week). Not sure why SA 2.55 didn't get it:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:23:22 -0400
From: Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: )US
Hello,
How do I setup SpamAssassin to query only bl.spamcop.net, and set a
very high score for that? I'm using spamd with vpopmail support.
Thanks,
Bill Shupp
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net
Sheesh, how much for a Gig of RAM now, about 200 Euros or so?
What's the problem?
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai
Schaetzl
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:12
the daemon.
Is there anything else I have to do?
Both installs are latest version 2.60
TIA,
Bill
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
The Screwfly Solution
A really good short story by SF writer Raccoona Sheldon/James Tiptree Jr./
(the late) Alice B. Sheldon as well.
Bet you didn't think anyone else would notice.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From:
I only have a couple of mailboxes here in my home office, but today was the
first day in WEEKS--since I got SA optimized--that SPAM got through.
We had three all from ostensibly the same source. Penis enlargement.
Hey, if I buy some, will they leave me alone?
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Again, this is a job...
FOR PROCMAIL!
(Admitting surprise that most don't use PROCMAIL along with SA...)
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver
Neubauer
Sent:
Best to do this as root. Or try /usr/bin/patch.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Krüger
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I set up Sendmail to reject email with a high score or
forward email to a local mailbox if it is within a certain
range of score?
The way I would do it is with a procmail recipe. Configure spamassassin to
use the stars header system and then set a recipe to redirect based on the
Well, I use procmail to send mail to SA.
So how about a recipe, checking to see if mail is to that certain mailbox,
and putting that recipe before the recipe that sends everything else to
SA?
I find that procmail solves a whole host of my email problems, btw.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
