Great, just wanted to be sure.
Thanks!
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:38 AM
> To: Mark Squire; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Auto-learn SA after having trained it
>
>
> At
Hi-
Sort of the same line of this subject, but has anyone written a script to
pull stats for setups not using spamd. My setup consists of spamassassin,
mime-defang and sendmail, I am not using spamc/spamd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Beha
from /var/log/messages
Jan 26 09:40:46 deimos spamd: The -a option has been removed
Jan 26 09:40:46 deimos spamd: spamd startup succeeded
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 11:41, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:55:17AM -0500, Mark Merchant wrote:
> > i can get AWL working wit
i can get AWL working with regular spamassassin, but NOT with spamc/d.
is there tip/trick i'm missing ?
> I've been using auto whitelist for a while now, but today while doing some
> experimentation I'm wondering if the explicit (auto) white listing feature
> is working at all (version 2.61)? I'
the whole company. I think that SA needs to "get out more"
and learn from a broader range of emails (if that makes sense). I
wanted to be sure that it is okay to put it into auto-learn mode, even
after I have been manually teaching it for a while. What do you good
folks think?
Th
Has anyone managed to get the amavisd webmin module to work? I could
not, and just wondered if what other people's experience was. Hope this
wasn't too far off topic.
Thanks,
Mark
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 200
n one
place, and and not the other. What is the point of specifying settings
in the local.cf, if the amavisd.conf works just as well if not better?
Or maybe it doesn't? What do you think?
Thanks,
Mark
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by
up to put a ***SPAM***
tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes through
it. I am wondering if it is possible to make Postfix only call amavis,
and SA for certain users, and just pass along the rest of the emails
(for now while I am testing). Any ideas?
Thanks!
Mark
. I am wondering if it is possible to make Postfix only call amavis,
and SA for certain users, and just pass along the rest of the emails
(for now while I am testing). Any ideas?
Thanks!
Mark
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon
Just a quick note. Tripwire is a commercial IDS package, sold by Tripwire
Inc. We might have to watch our for trademark infringement.
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software
ings, and move on from there.
Thanks
again!
-Original Message-From: Richard Ozer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004
9:03 AMTo: Mark SquireCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Which
conf file?
Spamassassin is loaded by amavisd upon
startu
Hi Group,
Suppose I have SA set to be called from Amavisd, which is called from
Postfix. If I wanted to tell it to tag spam, would I do that in the
amavisd.conf file, the spamassassin.cf file, the main.cf file (for
postfix) or somewhere else that I am missing? Currently it is defined
in both the
Looks to be my boo boo evidently. I thought I had set the
/var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf to the correct DNS server, but
evidently I didn't. Too close to the problem I guess.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Squire
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:35 PM
> To:
4 2:25 PM
> To: Mark Squire; SpamAssassin ML
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] DNS issues
>
>
> You stated you setup the DNS server for the test network..
> but you didn't say what nameservers your prod servers are
> using...and if there if you have xfer'd the zones or no
Hi all,
Some of you were kind enough to give this new-B some advice before
regarding this issue, but I am a little baffled by something. I set up
a mail server as a test server, and put it on it's own network. I then
set up a router so that it can route to and from our prod net. I set up
a DNS s
Above 5 and it goes into the SPAM folder, but these are at least cursorily
examined before trashing.
Above 10 and it goes directly into the trash, never to be seen again.
mh
At 07:32 AM Monday1/12/2004, Carl Chipman wrote:
What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I
http://au2.spamassassin.org is out of date. It shows the latest version to
be v2.55
Best Regards
Mark Waterhouse
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
On January 10, 2004, Waterfront Internet Service wrote:
> Anyone have or know of a web front end so users can set their own scores,
> whitelists & blacklists which is saved to their own user rules?
Check out webmin/usermin.
http://www.webmin.com/
http://www.usermin.com/
Mark
--
&
NYONE ON EARTH the email address. It wasn't a common username either -
a combination of street address and initials of the company,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Go ahead and spam it - I don't work there
anymore!) :-)
Mark
--
Mark Frank
Director of Technical Services
I'll try creating one. Thanks Theo.
C:\Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:48 PM
> To: Mark Squire
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA name resolution
>
>
> On
loading postfix and
amavis with the "reload" parameter. The resolv.conf file under
/var/spool/postfix/etc/ matches the /etc/resolv.conf and both match
/etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/resolv.conf.
TIA,
C:\Mark
---
This SF.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Mark London wrote:
>Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cy
Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cyrus, and
redhat linux. Any idea why it's not working? Thanks. - Mark
Received: fro
o it):
body __HG_HORMONE /\b(?:human growth hormone|(?-i:HGH)|H\W*G\W*H)\b/i
And phrases should be added to catch all that spam regarding savings
on meds! Like searching subject lines for save savings + drugs meds
prescription, etc.
Mark
expiry, or just a plain
performance problem.
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the ba
2000 system. Is
there some way to copy them off exchange into a mailbox on SpamAssassin
and run sa-learn on it? Or is there a better way?
Thanks,
C:\Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or
to be working. I start spamd with this: "spamd -a -d". I did some
digging in the archives, and ddin't see much mention of the issue, or what
it took to fix it. Is this really a problem on Solaris, or is it pretty
much a non-
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 15:36, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >header RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL eval:check_rbl('SECSAGE',
> >'blackhole.securitysage.com.')
> Check out how check_rbl_from_host works in the RFCI_DSN rule (quoted in my
> other post to this thread).
Perfect, thanks all.
--
The Flying Hamster <[EMAIL
Afternoon all,
I've had a dig through the archives and wiki for a definitive answer
with no success. Is it currently possible to use DNS based domain
blacklists at the moment in SA? (such as
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html)
thanks
Mark
--
Mark Lowes &l
=> '/etc/mail/spamassassin',
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash s
TXT
^^^ anywhere in this list above
After chrooting takes place the Perl modules are no longer reachable
at their expected paths, which is why Perl 'use' or 'require'
fails if done too late.
I'll add this module to the lis
Friend gave this to me this morning:
uri CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOF
/\x01\s*\@|&\#01\s*\@/
score CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOF (up to you, I set it
to 5.0)
describe CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOFCustom: URL tries to
spoof its identity via an IE trick
Anyone care to c
Updated regex from my friend:
uri CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOF /\x01\s*\@|&\#01\s*\@|\%01\s*\@/
He missed the %01 encoding.
-Original Message-
From: Ivar Snaaijer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Need
g the spamc client. Any ideas??
Regards,
Mark Norton
o wise to put a limit
on mail size in your MTA and/or keep the $sa_mail_body_size_limit
at a reasonable value.
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for I
Appologies, I've solved my own problem. (I *always* forget to turn DCC back
off) Adding score DCC_CHECK 0 to my local.cf right now. :)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Muller
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation
this happening with
their upgrades. I've added -m 15 to my spamd and it's not helped reduce
scan times at all so it's not the max-children change. Any thoughts?
Regards,
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
:Agent" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 392.
debug: leaving helper-app run mode
After reading some of the other posts, I get the idea that
this has to do with how the perl modules got installed. Can someone please
point me in the right direction?
Thanks!
Mark Norton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Mark Muller wrote:
>
>> promotion.entertainment.com (70)
>> a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82)
>> and service.bfast.com (150)
>>
>> Personally, I'll be whitelisting ticketmaster rather than removing
>> akmaitech :P I hate those g
than removing akmaitech
:P I hate those guys. But obviously Chris wanted *zero* false positives,
and this is one.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Muller
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE
Bigevil just took a poke at a legit ticketmaster confirmation email, hit on
3 rules: 70, 82 and 150.
I'm tracking down the specific URLS, one is entertainment.com :(
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
There certainly is a rule, and it caught this mail: HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE
The score on it is just really low. I've been pondering bumping it up.
-Original Message-
From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtal
Watch for hits? It shouldn't take long, those rules hit about 1 in 5 for
me.
-Original Message-
From: Vee Persaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
How can I tell that S
is can be
done with SpamAssassin. But you need a different implementation of
SpamAssassin for that, integrated into a Milter. Have a look at this list:
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
Perhaps they have what you are looking for.
Kind regards,
- Mark
search but not found an answer to disable on a per user basis.
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Cache poisoning on relays.osirusoft.com??
> > WTF?? So, I ran ov
checks altogether;
something sure is fishy!
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net G
:58 bayes_toks
It also seems excessively world readable/writeable. :)
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE
:58 bayes_toks
It also seems excessively world readable/writeable. :)
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE
re we?
I agree, though, that Logan, being attacked here as he was, handled himself
with class, in the lion's den. That is rare; probably as rare as the mistake
he made.
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Pro
I was running a whitelist on our local domain for a long time but overcoming
whitelisted spam became too much of a chore. So I removed the whitelist
entry and replaced with a header check on Received to verify it came from
our internal machines, then assigned it -50. Then I slap a 5.1 on anything
ind that you cannot change anything at all. Is,
conversely, such an unalterable program then a pre? I think not.
I eagerly await your new article.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed t
to poor
Docs, things that don't work, and things that work but not as they are
supposed to. However time and time again, the end result is that MOST
open source software is more cost effective in the end than most
commercial software if you look at the true cost of ownership.
Just my 2 cents
It manages load load the whole dynablock zone in less
than 8MB (!), so it is worth trying to get to work, I'd say.
Thanks,
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more producti
g character
> can be a space or a carriage return (newline?) ?
/ badtext\s+goodtext /
Takes care of a TAB too. :)
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does
course.
Well, I better be real quick and do a huge rsync today, and grab me the
whole dynalist before it is too late. Good thing I run my own DNS. Others
may not be so fortunate.
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
only got 1 (!) hit on it. Seems a bit lame. Unless the former
two cover pretty much everything the latter does too.
- Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
he
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall
Folks:
Anybody
have any experience in flagging this type of obscuration: with a rule? Did it generate lots of false
positives (for SPAM)?
Mark
M.
server sheltering the Exchange server from
Dictionary spam attacks. then plug in SpamAssassin some sort of MIME
defang, an AV solution or whatever other tools suit you, and you will
be good to go.
Mark Hepler
Paul Hutchings wrote:
Robban,
I've never used sendmail (too daunting for a n
e bayes to work on the remote
boxes?
Thanks.
--
Mark A. Puchalski
Network Engineer
Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn
LLP
Tel 313.465.7167
Fax 31
DNSBL has been
so effective in blocking spam as this dynamic block list. I kid you not when
I say spam has been reduced by 90% and up!
I'm loving it so much even, that this morning I added the entire dynablock
zone to my DNS. BIND rose to a whopping
the same policy.
Is there anyone here who has some answers on this matter?
Thanks!
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
development
Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS
resolution for it.
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP
accidentally blocked something. But it makes
no difference. Can anyone please tell me why this occurs?
Much obliged,
- Mark
P.S. I had to subscribe with a different address, just to get this post out.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
ers of SpamAssassin, since
it violates these laws."
Yeah, you know what? Let us sue the Sendmail Consortium too; because, after
all, sendmail "examines" private email too, and not just the headers. :) And
all without a Court order! :)
What a loser.
- Mark
-
- Original Message -
From: "Kelsey Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Using MRTG to display highest connection counts
> On Thu, Oct
to automate the
process so users can submit messages would make my life easier.
does anyone know of a website that has an example of setting up a
spamtrap like this with postfix ?
thanks for your assistance.
--
Mark Hepler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post, I wrote my own but would like to see if you included something
in yours that could be useful
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mikea
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:13 PM
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: [SAtalk] stats script
I hav
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:10:53PM -0800, Mark Schoonover wrote:
>> provided, and it adds the headers just fine. Running spamd with -D,
>> and I can see it detecting spam just fine, it just won't add the
>> default headers.
>
> hrm. if p
Funny you should ask, as 2.60 filtered the forward just fine on my side with
pbw installed. Even without Backhair this would have been filtered.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Howard Brazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail
Hello,
Is there someone who has used MRTG to display highest connection counts?
Though not necessarily spam, I would like to get an overview of who has been
trying to connect an inordinate amount of times during the day.
Thanks,
- Mark
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:20:19PM -0800, Mark Schoonover wrote:
>> that didn't work. I can see in my logs that ifspamh is detecting
>> spam just fine, what's not happening is the headers being added to
>> every spam email.
>
>
Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more than 3 instances of
in each email to mark it as spam? Maybe I could just score it lower per instance, say
.2
There were 58 instances of in this email and 63 instances of .
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto
en and I'd
have to say anyone sending messages like this is obviously a
spammer.
Mark
e should I be looking for??
Thanks again!
.mark
"The United States is putting together a Constitution now for Iraq.
Why don't we just give them ours? It's served us well for 200 years,
and we don't appear to be using it anymore, so what the hell?" -- Jay Leno
--
Thanks guys, I ran with -D and got this line:
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
Problem solved!
Mark
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:23:20AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> I had the same problem for a while.
>
> > No matter what I do, I get something like:
> >
&g
Hello,
I've done my due diligence but can't figure this out:
No matter what I do, I get something like:
~/Mail >sa-learn --spam --mbox spam
Learned from 0 message(s) (1927 message(s) examined).
~/Mail >sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/spool/mail/mark
Learned from 0 message(s) (111 mes
ften work
just fine. I've since disabled the nmap scans, and spamd hasn't crashed on
any of the satellites.
Has anyone else seen similar problems? or care to confirm my suspicions
that the nmap scans could be causing sp
Is anyone else also getting some emails lately two or three times? As far
as I know I am only subscribed to one of these lists...
Perhaps one list is actually subscribed to the other?
cheers.
--
Mark Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---
This
n't use 'average' on datasets that are not uniform or gaussian in their
nature, but can easily be skewed (e.g. a single whitelisted score of -100
will bump the average way out). Much better measure is the median value
(the middle element in the sorted list, you don't need
not sure if this is a spamassassin or milter issue, but here goes.
i've been running spammassassin 2.54 & spamass-milter for 6 months or
so. yesterday i decided to upgrade to 2.6 ( via cpan ).
now, the spamass-milter daemon seems to stop running every few
minutes.
is spamassassin 2.60 not comapati
Yes, Larry, it's a firewall configuration issue. If you receive responses
from a few public DCC servers, your firewall is likely allowing DCC to do
its job.
- Mark Rice
> --
> From: Larry Gilson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > According to reports
Bug submitted as
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2579
>
Thanks Malte, and sorry that I made a double post of the issue.
Mark Rice
> --
> From: Malte S. Stretz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:48 AM
> To:
SA users that implement DCC need this info...
[Forwarded from the DCC mailing list.]
- Mark Rice
> --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I'm just forwarding this note from the dcc-mailing list because it has
relevance to the SpamAssassin list.
- Mark Rice
> --
...
> According to reports from other people, the SpamAssassin documentation
> does mention using `cdcc info` to see if the DCC client is working,
>
Scott Griffith, ISES-LLC wrote:
On Oct 6, Mark Edwards wrote:
I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current
FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it
successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get:
sudo
have to do to
tighten my net around spam!
Thanks Much!
Mark
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing lis
I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current
FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it
successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get:
sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh start
Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with
problem was present if you were running less than 2.5x, but that's
not the case here. Will upgrading my mimedefang help? Is this a
spamassassin configuration problem? Any other suggestions? Thanks. -
Mark
X-Spam-Level: 4.6 () BASE64_ENC_TEXT,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Sca
Look at /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-2.60/sample-spam.txt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Eduardo Gargiulo
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] spam test
Hi all
This is my first message to the
I got the following spam message, which has a low rating. The
construction of the To: line is "To: user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"I've
seen this in a lot of spam, and can't imagine how a real message sent
to me would have this form, so I would like to create a test for this
situation. Has anyon
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:58:44 -0400
From: Scott Rothgaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Palmetto Network Solutions, Ltd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Restart Spamd
Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> kill -HUP should work with SpamAssassin 2.60 under Perl 5.6.1 and up
Qmail-scanner does work well as long as your qmail is patched. Remember
that if you use qmail-scanner, it runs as the user qsand so your
.user_prefs will end up there and not in /etc/mail/spamassassin/ unless
you call it some other way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[E
You could build them from the source RPM. If you are not up to that,
here they are...
http://www.neod.net/sa/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Young
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] 2.6
27;s skipping it.
Or is there some reason to believe that's not the case?
--
Mark Roedel
Web Programmer / Analyst
LeTourneau University
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
From: "Hannu Liljemark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:18:48 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SIGHUP crashing spamd in 2.60
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:21:32PM -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
> Anyone else not able to SIGHUP
I was excited to see the addition of SIGHUP functionality in 2.60.
Unfortunately, while spamd seems to receive and obey the signal:
Sep 27 15:15:50 lilbuddy spamd[47851]: server hit by SIGHUP, restarting
spamd dies shortly thereafter.
I'm running the port on FreeBSD 4.8p10.
I do have the razo
sassin/user-prefs -
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Stop Exerpt from ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs -
Is this a bug in the newest version of SA 2.6.0?
Is this a problem w/ me doing whitelists wrong?
Is there some way to prevent this in future?
thanks,
mark
-
/Mail-Box-2.048.tar.gz)
Module Mail::SpamAssassin (J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55.tar.gz)
In case I get tired of waiting, I've got a follow-up question:
Is downloading the tarball and installing it myself fundamentally
different than just doing the install from
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
