[SAtalk] poll: still faked Habeas headers?

2004-01-31 Thread guenther
SPAM fighters: - Can you verify the end of this infringement? - Is this just a coincidence? All reports greatly appreciated. You can mail me directly if you wish and I will post the results here. TIA ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0

Re: [SAtalk] Phony Habeas mark on spam...I knew it was just a matter of time

2004-01-12 Thread guenther
added local headers. I don't think they are useful at all for Habeas. So the question is: May I safely cut that information out, when forwarding those messages to Habeas? And thoughts? TIA ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-17 Thread guenther
into your local.cf or user_prefs. My first guess is to save the resultant ouput in a file in ~/.procmailrc, and then include it in my .procmailrc. Good guess? Nope. ;-) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x

detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
: (Bareword ALL not allowed while strict subs in use at /etc/mail/spamassassin/detoken-address.cf, rule W_B64_H, line 1. ) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m

Re: detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
... This is the only rule that failes for me: rawbody W_B64_HALL =~ /Z3VlbnRoZXJAcnVkZXJzcG9ydC5kZQ/ describe W_B64_H Listwashing token found in head - Base64 score W_B64_H 1.0 For now I just disable this one. However, I really don't see, what the issue might be... ...guenther -- char *t

Re: detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
W_B64_HALL =~ /Z3VlbnRoZXJAcnVkZXJzcG9ydC5kZQ/ Doh, should have seen this myself... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0

Re: [SAtalk] procmail query

2003-11-29 Thread guenther
I want to backup my incoming mail before sending it to spamassasin. I have made the following .procmailrc. :0 c: backup :0fw: spamassassin.lock * 256000 | spamassassin Can someone tell if this is fine. Looks good. See 'man procmailex' for this and other examples. ...guenther

RE: [SAtalk] How to whitelist this mailinglist

2003-11-27 Thread guenther
placeholders for a valid char): Subject =~ /\[.*\]/ Notes: Case-insensitiveness is not needed. You probably wanna force a char by using + rather than *. And a word char \w is even more appropriate, than any char but newlines. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c

Re: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread guenther
rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: ) see/i I want this to catch prefer not to see and prefer not tosee but the (?: ) doesn't seem to catch whether the space exists or not. rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i You simply want an optional space... ...guenther

Re: [SAtalk] Changing a default message

2003-11-13 Thread guenther
See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' or http://spamassassin.org/doc/ for more info. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Updated Corn

2003-11-11 Thread guenther
be cool to just wget those files... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.Net email

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Updated Corn

2003-11-11 Thread guenther
;]\\#(?:0*(?:90|122)|x0*[57]A);[^]/i (I had the popcorn link above the rules, but it was a little hard to see) Doh! My bad. Yep, that is hard to see... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h

archive or thread as mbox? (RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Popcorn, Backhair, and Weeds)

2003-10-19 Thread guenther
. :) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise

[SAtalk] Redirect ?

2003-10-17 Thread guenther
to install) -- and the results are great! Very good job, folks, thanks! :-) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0

[SAtalk] Redirect and AWL ?

2003-10-17 Thread guenther
[ Modified the subject, as I originally forgot a topic. ] On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:19, Matt Kettler wrote: At 08:53 AM 10/17/2003, guenther wrote: I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in FAQ 5.1. This will add extra headers (especially Received headers

Re: [SAtalk] Content-Disposition: inline ?

2003-10-16 Thread guenther
: header is text/plain. Seems to behave the same, from a quick glance. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0

Re: [SAtalk] Content-Disposition: inline ?

2003-10-16 Thread guenther
again, Daniel. :) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.net email

Re: [SAtalk] FormMail messages getting caught

2003-09-03 Thread guenther
.) Replace your FormMail script with something that doesn't turn your system into an open relay and SpamAssassin should work as intended, no rule-mangling necessary. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128

Re: [SAtalk] FormMail messages getting caught

2003-09-03 Thread guenther
. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome

[SAtalk] postmaster: cutting down undeliverable spam

2003-08-26 Thread guenther
not the first who want to accomplish this, am I? ;) Any hints or thoughts about this issue? Anyone, who already did this? My setup: fetchmail, procmail, spamc/d (2.55) TIA for any answers... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i

Re: [SAtalk] To the SA developers

2003-06-22 Thread guenther
of the site is in German. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.Net email

Re: [SAtalk] To the SA developers

2003-06-22 Thread guenther
and make it transparent. But none right now without any caveats, stumbling blocks or customization for any given location. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h

Re: [SAtalk] site wide BAYES

2003-06-01 Thread guenther
. :-) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office

Re: [SAtalk] Re: site wide BAYES

2003-06-01 Thread guenther
not need viagra... ;-) And yes, I trust those users. Um, mainly... I will have that in mind when trying to implement it. Thanks for your thoughts... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h

Re: [SAtalk] Evolution and SPAM Assassin

2003-06-01 Thread guenther
enough with them, to tell you which to use. Anyone here using Evolution? If so, do I need to reinvent the wheel? Yep, using Evolution... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1

Re: [SAtalk] site wide BAYES

2003-06-01 Thread guenther
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 22:30, William Stearns wrote: Good evening, Guenther, Good morning, William, How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide BAYES database. TIA http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting Now that page looks

Re: [SAtalk] Can I teach SA

2003-05-31 Thread guenther
. To get the missing 1 point, Bayes even won't need to stamp it as 'high-quality' spam. As soon as you got Bayes trained, that will catch all those 4.0 spam. (Although I have not used SA for a long time, I really benefit from Bayes dumping those little buggers...) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL

[SAtalk] site wide BAYES

2003-05-30 Thread guenther
hey folks, Would it be wise (actually, would it do any harm) to have one BAYES database for a whole site, instead of per-user basis? (Just a hand full of users.) How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide BAYES database. TIA ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] kicking SPAM: AWL, custom rules

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
eXchanger. - fetchmail polling some POP3 accounts - procmail sorting and feeding through spamc/d If I'm wrong and there is a way to reject this mails, please let me know. ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x

RE: [SAtalk] kicking SPAM: AWL, custom rules

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
:' header, cause it never changed so far. And I do not know anything about RAWBODY. If anyone feels like, please enlighten me about it. btw, as I said previously: I had to set this rude rule, cause the mails were not rated SPAM by SA... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h

Re: [SAtalk] kicking SPAM: AWL, custom rules

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 09:15, Tony Earnshaw wrote: man, 26.05.2003 kl. 20.42 skrev guenther: Although that unfortunately was not the answer to my question. The mails are actually SPAM. However, for some of them the Auto Whitelist totally reverts the result (a mail from today): +5.5

[SAtalk] how to get rid of false AWL?

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
the documentation and searching for some particular answers... ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0

Re: [SAtalk] how to get rid of false AWL?

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
folder if it worked... ;-) ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.net email

Re: [SAtalk] how to get rid of false AWL?

2003-05-27 Thread guenther
it. [ snip: more good info ] ...guenther -- char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1: (c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} --- This SF.net email

[SAtalk] Re: procmail error when forwarding to a razor database

2002-03-03 Thread Philip Guenther
because it doesn't see the alias. Philip Guenther ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk