Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread Arne Metzger
Hi, on my vm running Suse10.0 i can't reproduce this. Regards, Arne Sam Clippinger schrieb am 15.10.2008 03:17: I forgot to ask earlier -- when you activated full logging, were any log files actually produced? If I could see them, they would probably be very helpful in tracking this

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread Felix Buenemann
You could try running a debug build of spamdyke (unstripped binary, remote the strip command from Makefile) and attach gdb or strace to a process (id) that is eating up all cpu. That should help Sam to find what the problem is. Note that debug builds have a larger memory footprint, so you might

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi, forgot not all of you are software developers, so added some explanation of how to extract a useable backtrace from a running process with gdb. Am 15.10.2008 8:27 Uhr, Felix Buenemann schrieb: You could try running a debug build of spamdyke (unstripped binary, remote the strip command from

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke +ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry option

2008-10-15 Thread Tim Mancour
Sam, There is a set of POSIX compatible regular expression functions available in C. The functions regcomp() and regexec() are both used by qmail to provide regexp testing for the control/badx files. Regards, Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread David Stiller
Yes, me also. Looks like this is one of the reasons, why Linux-tools are mostly developped for specific systems, when making RPM's. So Spamdyke 4.0.5 seems to be good for SuSE's, and maybe not on others? Just quick shot from me^^ :) Arne Metzger schrieb: Hi, on my vm running Suse10.0 i can't

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread Arthur Girardi
Hi Sam, Will that also solve the issue of smtp errors on the client-side? I couldn't find any log for those customers who had those errors, not even in the syslog. I did copy the error tho, if that may be of any help. Can reproduce that anytime too. And just to correct myself earlier, its

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread Paulo Henrique
One of my customers reported a problem like this, he could not send a message of 23MB. Outlook Express View the error code: 0x800ccc0f 2008/10/15 Arthur Girardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Sam, Will that also solve the issue of smtp errors on the client-side? I couldn't find any log for those

[spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread mis
Free BSD 6.0 release p16 spamdyke 4.0.5 created /usr/local/spamdyke dir tar -xzvf filename ran ./configure - completed (no errors until make, see snapshot below) checking for library containing getopt_long... none required checking whether anonymous inner functions are supported by default...

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread Peter Kieser
gcc segfaults on FreeBSD 6.0/i386 when compiling spamdyke. I have the port marked as broken for FreeBSD = 6.0 -Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 10/15/2008 12:04 PM: Free BSD 6.0 release p16 spamdyke 4.0.5 created /usr/local/spamdyke dir tar -xzvf filename ran ./configure - completed (no

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread Sam Clippinger
This came up a couple of weeks ago also: http://www.mail-archive.com/spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org/msg01635.html gcc is crashing, not spamdyke, so even if there were something I could do to fix it, I don't know where to start. -- Sam Clippinger Peter Kieser wrote: gcc segfaults on FreeBSD

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread mis
I understand. Somebody I know is running spamdyke v3.18 under Free BSD 6.0 successfully. Can I download v3.18 somewhere? Tks! Darren. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Clippinger Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 15:46 To: spamdyke

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi Darren Peter, I looked into this issue and found a simple fix: Simply by creating a preprocessed source and then running gcc on that preprocessed source will avoid the compiler crash. Please try the attached patch on a clean source of the latest spamdyke release. Be sure to remove Makefile

Re: [spamdyke-users] make fails on FBSD

2008-10-15 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi Shantanu, please try the attached patch and see if it fixes your problem. -- Felix Buenemann Am 02.10.2008 8:24 Uhr, K. Shantanu schrieb: Hello, I am trying to build spamdyke-4.0.4 on FreeBSD 6.2 with gcc 3.4.6. ./configure works fine but make fails. # make gcc -Wall -O2

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.5 install problem on Free BSD 6.0 release p16

2008-10-15 Thread Sam Clippinger
Excellent work! I'll get a FreeBSD 6.0 test machine installed so I can incorporate this change permanently into spamdyke's Makefile. -- Sam Clippinger Felix Buenemann wrote: Hi Darren Peter, I looked into this issue and found a simple fix: Simply by creating a preprocessed source and then