Yes,  me also. Looks like this is one of the reasons, why Linux-tools 
are mostly
developped for specific systems, when making RPM's. So Spamdyke 4.0.5 seems
to be good for SuSE's, and maybe not on others? Just quick shot from me^^ :)

Arne Metzger schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> on my vm running Suse10.0 i can't reproduce this.
>
> Regards,
> Arne
>
>
> Sam Clippinger schrieb am 15.10.2008 03:17:
>   
>> I forgot to ask earlier -- when you activated full logging, were any log 
>> files actually produced?  If I could see them, they would probably be 
>> very helpful in tracking this down.
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>
>> Arthur Girardi wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I too noticed the high cpu usage by spamdyke in the 4.0.5 version.  
>>> Like 6 or 7 spamdyke processes running at 100% cpu on a dual  
>>> quad-core...
>>>
>>> Interesting enough, I noticed not all spamdyke did go 100%, only those  
>>> that had some kind of attachment, a gif, jpg, a signature, whatever,  
>>> encoded in base64. The message does finish successfully and life goes  
>>> on, but I started having some slowdown complaints, and after this  
>>> first post to the list, I saw I had the same issue.
>>>
>>> If you strace the process while it is hanging at high cpu, you'll see  
>>> a lot of Timeouts mixed with reads and writes of what seems to be the  
>>> content of the base64 attachment.
>>>
>>> Then I tried changing output from my normal verbose operation to  
>>> excessive, and enabled full-log-dir, but just as I did that, cpu usage  
>>> fell down, and clients started getting smtp error messages containing  
>>> chunks of spamdyke's excessive output.
>>>
>>> I'm running spamdyke on a rhel5.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Arthur
>>>
>>> Citando Paulo Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi...
>>>>
>>>> 2008/10/14 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> This is the first I've heard of this -- can you provide any more
>>>>> information about it?  Did those spamdyke processes produce any log
>>>>> messages or errors?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> No errors.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Did they begin eating the CPU before or after
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> accepting/rejecting a message?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Apparently once the message is accepted.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Did you try turning on full logging to
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> see exactly what was going on?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Yet I did not.
>>>>
>>>>   What OS are you running?
>>>>
>>>> Linux Slackware 12.1, kernel 2.6.24-5-smp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> tks.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>>>
>>>>> Erald Troja wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I second your findings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We reverted to 4.0.4 right away.
>>>>>> Did not report it as we were unable
>>>>>> to find a good explanation for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The spamdyke processes were just lingering each consuming
>>>>>> between 70% to 100% of CPU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Erald Troja
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paulo Henrique wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working
>>>>>>> with a high load,  the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5,
>>>>>>> someone noticed this problem? What may be happening?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> "Muitos homens perdem a saúde para ganhar dinheiro, depois perdem o
>>>> dinheiro para ganhar a saúde. - Confúcio"
>>>>
>>>> Paulo Henrique Fonseca
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   


-- 
BLACKBIT neue Medien GmbH | BLACKBIT neue Werbung GmbH
Technischer Support/ Hotline
Ernst-Ruhstrat-Straße 6 - D-37079 Göttingen

Geschäftsführer: Stefano Viani
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Göttingen,  HRB 3222
Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer (§ 27a UstG): DE 813 114 917

Tel: +49-551-50675-50 - Fax: +49-551-50675-20
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Klassische Werbung und Online-Marketing: http://www.blackbit.de
Software fuer Online-Marketing: http://www.go-community.de

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to