Sam, Very many thanks for the explanation and your list of words. The
warning is duly noted and I will probably add to it slowly only.
Kind regards,
Christoph
-Original Message-
From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Sam
In a recent thread, Sam very kindly shared his keywords with us. As a
matter of interest, I went to some recent emails to see if I could find any
of those keywords in there. I don't *think* any of the words are there. I
have put 5 examples of recent Spam that got through and wondered if there
Actually, the keyword filter doesn't match that way. In order for a
keyword to match, it must be surrounded by non-alphanumeric characters
(dots or dashes). This is because I don't want the keyword dynamic to
be found in a name like 11-22-33-44.nondynamic.example.com, that just
isn't fair.
Again, you're looking in the wrong place. spamdyke doesn't examine the
message headers, so it doesn't matter what they contain. Instead, find
some of spamdyke's lines in your maillog file, then look for the
origin_ip and origin_rdns entries.
For example:
Sep 2 11:28:27 iconoclast
Hello Sam,
Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 12:05:59 AM, you wrote:
chkuser is just another filter that intercepts the data before qmail
sees it, so I don't see any reason it won't work with spamdyke. IIRC,
QmailToaster uses both chkuser and spamdyke. When chkuser rejects a
recipient,
Youri V. Kravatsky wrote:
Hello Sam,
Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 12:05:59 AM, you wrote:
chkuser is just another filter that intercepts the data before qmail
sees it, so I don't see any reason it won't work with spamdyke. IIRC,
QmailToaster uses both chkuser and spamdyke. When
Sergio Minini (NETKEY) wrote:
Mirko Buffoni escribió:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedGoods
average between 500 and 2000 daily. Figures are however
pretty standard. Spamdyke filters out about 60k attempts daily.
Here are yesterday stats:
Good : 1025 = 0.68
