[spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread nightduke
Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of spamdyke, i still using version of 2008. Thanks ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
nightduke wrote: Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of spamdyke, i still using version of 2008. Thanks 4.0.10 was released 12/17/08. I'm not aware of any bugs since then. Only Sam can say for sure when a new release will be coming. Are you looking for something in

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread nightduke
More featues with graylisting.Better perfomance. 2010/2/10 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net: nightduke wrote: Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of spamdyke, i still using version of 2008. Thanks 4.0.10 was released 12/17/08. I'm not aware of any bugs since then.

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
Which graylisting features are you looking for specificallly? Have you run the qtp-prune-graylist script I posted recently? Perhaps that will solve your performance issue? If not, what are you seeing that leads you to believe there is a problem with performance? nightduke wrote: More featues

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Jorge R. Constenla
The SpamDyke works great! without bugs. But is Very usefull (Excellent), if you can set some features per domain. Two Level to filter SPAM - General Level for all domains (the actual level) - And add a Domain Level Filter with features like: blacklist and whitelist lists (sender-blacklist, ,

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
Jorge R. Constenla wrote: The SpamDyke works great! without bugs. But is Very usefull (Excellent), if you can set some features per domain. Two Level to filter SPAM - General Level for all domains (the actual level) - And add a Domain Level Filter with features like: blacklist and

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
nightduke wrote: More features with graylisting,fast enable graylisting, I don't know what you mean by this. Perhaps Sam does. gui for spamdyke, There has been talk about this, and I believe someone has written something for this. I don't recall off hand though. You'll need to do some

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Jorge R. Constenla
The directory configuration is very complex but I think that I can't block senders (domains or email) per domain that I hosts. Do you know if you can do? Thanks in advance. Eric Shubert wrote: Jorge R. Constenla wrote: The SpamDyke works great! without bugs. But is Very usefull

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
If you give me some examples of what you're trying to do, I might be able to tell you how to do it. I'm not sure though, as I don't use this capability myself. Sam would know best. Jorge R. Constenla wrote: The directory configuration is very complex but I think that I can't block senders

Re: [spamdyke-users] file exist?bug?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
nightduke wrote: Very strange, i have downloaded the script... ./spamdyke-prune spamdyke-prune v0.3.0 spamdyke-prune processing graylist tree at /etc/spamdyke/graylist ... spamdyke-prune pruning entries older than 1814400 seconds ... spamdyke-prune processing domain vps ...

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Jorge R. Constenla
Sam, Thanks, It's really cool!. Do you know about Server Performance? Consuming? Another question, Can I block invalid users? I need to receive emails only to a valid users. Is there any way to accept only valid users and block non-existent users? For example: The users in example.com are

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'm not sure what you're asking about Server Performance or Consuming. If you want to know if the config-dir option causes spamdyke to run slower, the answer is yes, but just barely. With that option enabled, spamdyke has to do more work to look for additional configuration files, but not

Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?

2010-02-10 Thread Jorge R. Constenla
I'm going to change to the "config-dir" option in our servers, so that each domain can set your options and integrating with our control panel. I'll wait the next version for "block mail to invalid recipients" feature. Thanks. Best regards. Sam Clippinger wrote: I'm not sure what you're