Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-05-13 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'll add this to the filter list. Thanks! -- Sam Clippinger Arne Metzger wrote: Hi, sorry that i am pushing an older thread. I just found a new format for the IP address: May 6 23:25:13 xxx spamdyke[18356]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip:

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-25 Thread Marcin Orlowski
Sam Clippinger wrote: The defaults are described in the text of each section in the README file but not in the table that shows all of the configuration options... I didn't realize that. The defaults are printed in the help screen when you run spamdyke -h. --max-recipients NUM Allow a

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-25 Thread Sam Clippinger
Sorry about that. :) I've fixed the web page and the help text will be updated in version 4.0.0. Thanks! -- Sam Clippinger Marcin Orlowski wrote: Sam Clippinger wrote: The defaults are described in the text of each section in the README file but not in the table that shows all of the

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-24 Thread Marcin Orlowski
Sam Clippinger wrote: I can always use help writing documentation. Let me finish making the updates for the version 4.0 changes, then I'll send them to you to see if you think they need polishing. Thanks! BTW: documentation lacks information of default values, for options like

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-24 Thread Sam Clippinger
The defaults are described in the text of each section in the README file but not in the table that shows all of the configuration options... I didn't realize that. The defaults are printed in the help screen when you run spamdyke -h. I'll add the defaults to the usage section of the README

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-23 Thread Eric Shubert
Sam Clippinger wrote: You're reading the correct section. The third and fourth paragraphs describe reject-unresolvable-rdns, which is the filter that was triggered in your example. The text doesn't actually use the term A record, instead saying that spamdyke attempts to get an IP address

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-23 Thread Sam Clippinger
I can always use help writing documentation. Let me finish making the updates for the version 4.0 changes, then I'll send them to you to see if you think they need polishing. Thanks! -- Sam Clippinger Eric Shubert wrote: Sam Clippinger wrote: You're reading the correct section. The

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Sam Clippinger
This behavior is correct. The reject-ip-in-cc-rdns option will only block a connection if it meets two criteria: 1) The IP address must be part of the rDNS name. 2) The rDNS name must end in a two-character country code. That's why you're seeing some connections being blocked -- their

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Marcin Orlowski
Sam Clippinger wrote: This behavior is correct. The reject-ip-in-cc-rdns option will only I just found out that leading zero fools this filter: 111.222.111.33 = 111-222-11-033.domain pass while it should not Regards, -- Daddy, what Formatting drive C: means?... Marcin

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Eric Shubert
Sam Clippinger wrote: Other connections are not being blocked because their rDNS names don't end in country codes. Instead, they use three-character TLDs like .com and .net. If you want to block those connections as well, use the ip-in-rdns-keyword-file option and put .com and .net in

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Sam Clippinger
spamdyke looks for the IP address in many different formats. If the IP address is 11.22.33.44, it looks for: 11.22.33.44 011.022.033.044 11.022.033.044 (new in version 4.0.0) 11.22.033.044 (new in version 4.0.0) 11.22.33.044 (new in version 4.0.0) 44.33.22.11

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Eric Shubert
I see. I still think that regex's are more intuitive/flexible though. ;) Sam Clippinger wrote: If the entry starts with a dot, it will only match the end of the rDNS name. If there is no dot, it will match anywhere in the name. -- Sam Clippinger Eric Shubert wrote: Sam Clippinger

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Eric Shubert
Sam Clippinger wrote: spamdyke looks for the IP address in many different formats. If the IP address is 11.22.33.44, it looks for: 11.22.33.44 011.022.033.044 11.022.033.044 (new in version 4.0.0) 11.22.033.044 (new in version 4.0.0) 11.22.33.044 (new in version 4.0.0)

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Sam Clippinger
Sorry, I should have mentioned that the dots in the formats I listed can actually be any non-alphanumeric character (dashes, underscores, etc). -- Sam Clippinger Eric Shubert wrote: Sam Clippinger wrote: spamdyke looks for the IP address in many different formats. If the IP address is

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Marcin Orlowski
Sam Clippinger wrote: spamdyke looks for the IP address in many different formats. If the IP address is 11.22.33.44, it looks for: 11.22.33.44 011.022.033.044 [...] As for putting filter entries in the main configuration file instead of separate files, I'm a step ahead of you. :)

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Eric Shubert
That makes sense, but it's not what I read at http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#RDNS I don't see anything there about looking up a corresponding DNS A record. Is the documentation perhaps out of date? (or am I losing it?) ;) Do we perhaps need 2 parameter/rules? One for when the

Re: [spamdyke-users] problems with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2008-04-22 Thread Sam Clippinger
You're reading the correct section. The third and fourth paragraphs describe reject-unresolvable-rdns, which is the filter that was triggered in your example. The text doesn't actually use the term A record, instead saying that spamdyke attempts to get an IP address from the name. When I