-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello,
I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give you a
lot positive false spam. 2nd you completely have commented out best thing
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello,
I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give you a lot
positive false spam. 2nd you completely have commented
: Eduard Svarc esv...@intertech.cz
mailto:esv...@intertech.cz mailto:esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke
...@intertech.cz mailto:esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke usersspamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello,
I see you have two
, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello,
I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could
give
you a lot positive false spam. 2nd you completely have
commented out
best thing in SPAMDYKE. Is sniffing IPs
in the XBL
this doesnt look like false positive
From: Eduard Svarc esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello,
I see you have two
:
PBL239543
94.179.29.242 is not listed in the XBL
this doesnt look like false positive
From: Eduard Svarc esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing
Hello
is not listed in the XBL
this doesnt look like false positive
From: Eduard Svarc esv...@intertech.cz mailto:esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke
in the PBL, in the following records:
PBL239543
94.179.29.242 is not listed in the XBL
this doesnt look like false positive
From: Eduard Svarc esv...@intertech.cz
To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke
Hello,
I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give you a
lot positive false spam. 2nd you completely have commented out best thing
in SPAMDYKE. Is sniffing IPs in reverse DNS. Most of bots and spams
comming from Internet zombies. Here are my advices:
1 - comment out
Hi Eduard,
would you please explain me, why you add .com and .net to the
/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords file? They are valid
tld's to send mails from, or do i just miss anything?
Eduard Svarc schrieb:
Hello,
I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give you
a lot
11 matches
Mail list logo