I'm a bit confused here. If I understand you correctly, your server is
running spamdyke. Your MUA delivers a (large) message to your server,
which accepts it without errors. Then your server attempts to deliver
it to a remote server that is not running spamdyke. The remote server
times out
Hi Sam,
Sam Clippinger schrieb:
> The last timeout bug (that I know of) was fixed in 3.1.8. I haven't
> received any reports of timeout problems in 4.0 (yet). If you can
> trigger this problem with 4.0, please try to capture a full log and
> let's arrange some way to get it to me (my server won't
The last timeout bug (that I know of) was fixed in 3.1.8. I haven't
received any reports of timeout problems in 4.0 (yet). If you can
trigger this problem with 4.0, please try to capture a full log and
let's arrange some way to get it to me (my server won't accept 50 MB
emails, sorry).
-- Sam
Felix Buenemann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask about your opinion on a good value for idle-timeout-secs
> – I've started with a value of 60 seconds, which strangely caused
> TIMEOUTs during mail delivery of large mails (over 10MB) from clinet
> MTAs with SMTP AUTH (specifically the mail pa
Hello,
I'd like to ask about your opinion on a good value for idle-timeout-secs
– I've started with a value of 60 seconds, which strangely caused
TIMEOUTs during mail delivery of large mails (over 10MB) from clinet
MTAs with SMTP AUTH (specifically the mail path was: Client MS Exchange
(DSL up