[spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... spamdyke version 5.0.0 is now available! Get it here: http://www.spamdyke.org/ This version is a major update that adds 12 new options, renames 3 options and removes 5 options. The meaning of "whitelisted" is changed to allow whi

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Haggy
Wow! Thanks Sam,Because of all the changes to spamdyke's options I also have to build a major release of the Spamdyke Control Panel.Is there a problem to patch the new Version 5.0 for mysql like the old Version?Haggy - Original-Nachricht -Von: Sam Clippinger An: spamdyke users , Cc:

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Laurence Gill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nice work, thanks. I was hoping you may cross this from your to-do list in the next release :) - Add the ability to require TLS/SSL before authentication is allowed (e.g. a "require-tls" value for "smtp-auth-level". Credit goes to Eric Shuber

[spamdyke-users] runs missing error

2014-01-28 Thread Lawrence
Good afternoon Gents I have just installed version 4.3.1 this fine gateway on my plesk and all seems to be working fine with a couple of exceptions. watching the logs I noticed a couple of what should be considered trustworthy site being rejected by DENIED_RDNS_MISSING when others are fine. ho

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
No, I'm sure the MySQL patch will take some tweaking, but it should still work. This version didn't make major changes to the way the core code is structured. -- Sam Clippinger On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Haggy wrote: > Wow! Thanks Sam, > > Because of all the changes to spamdyke's optio

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Eric Shubert
On 01/28/2014 08:42 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote: > Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... spamdyke > version 5.0.0 is now available! Get it here: > http://www.spamdyke.org/ > > This version is a major update that adds 12 new options, renames 3 > options and removes 5 options. T

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
That shouldn't be very hard to add. I can't make any promises on a timeframe, but I'll see what I can do. :) -- Sam Clippinger On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Laurence Gill wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Nice work, thanks. > > I was hoping you may cross this f

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Laurence Gill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Excellent, thank you very much :) Cheers On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:40:31 -0600 Sam Clippinger wrote: > That shouldn't be very hard to add. I can't make any promises on a > timeframe, but I'll see what I can do. :) > > -- Sam Clippinger > > > >

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread BC
Thank you, Sam. Will spamdyke do IPv6 records as well? On 1/28/2014 8:42 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote: Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... spamdyke version 5.0.0 is now available! Get it here: http://www.spamdyke.org/ This version is a major update that adds 12 ne

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
No, spamdyke has no IPv6 support at all. Yet. -- Sam Clippinger On Jan 28, 2014, at 6:55 PM, BC wrote: > > > Thank you, Sam. Will spamdyke do IPv6 records as well? > > > On 1/28/2014 8:42 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote: >> Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... spa

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 5.0.0

2014-01-28 Thread BC
Okay, thanks. On 1/28/2014 6:00 PM, Sam Clippinger wrote: No, spamdyke has no IPv6 support at all. Yet. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users