Re: [spctools-discuss] iProphet for Leucine/isoleucine IDs

2018-06-12 Thread David Shteynberg
Yes your understanding of the issue is spot on. iProphet converts everything to L for comparison, then reports the top hit from the highest scoring search engine as reported by the search engine. Post processing has to take care of how to treat the variants. Cheers, -David On Tue, Jun 12, 2018

Re: [spctools-discuss] iProphet for Leucine/isoleucine IDs

2018-06-12 Thread Chih-Chiang Tsou
Hi David, Thank you for the quick reply. The three search engines I am using they rank I/L variant peptides inconsistently. Some ranks Leucine-version as rank 1, some ranks Isoleucine-version as rank 1. Then in iProphet pepXML file I observed that for each spectrum iProphet picks rank 1 hit info

Re: [spctools-discuss] iProphet for Leucine/isoleucine IDs

2018-06-12 Thread David Shteynberg
Hello Chih-Chiang, iProphet will convert all Isoleucines reported to Leucines for comparison purposes. Have you observed an error in your analyses? -David On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Chih-Chiang Tsou wrote: > Dear TPP developers, > > I have a question regarding how iProphet handles

[spctools-discuss] iProphet for Leucine/isoleucine IDs

2018-06-12 Thread Chih-Chiang Tsou
Dear TPP developers, I have a question regarding how iProphet handles ambiguous I/L IDs from different search engine. I am using X!Tandem, Comet, and MSGF+ and combine the results using iProphet, and noticed that the three search engines have different rules ranking I/L hits. So how does