Re: [spctools-discuss] Changes in number of peptides identifications in TPP 6.0 RC

2021-04-13 Thread 'David Shteynberg' via spctools-discuss
Hi Oded, I think the old 5.2.0 might be under estimating the error rate as compared to the new release candidate. You cannot see the decoys here because of the settings you used. However your database has two independent sets of decoys available DECOY0 and DECOY1. Can you use one of the set

RE: [spctools-discuss] Re: convert Splib

2021-04-13 Thread Eric Deutsch
You can convert the sptxt format to msp with: rename mylibrary.sptxt mylibrary.msp sptxt and msp are effectively the same thing. There is no specification on exactly what msp is and it has evolved a little over time, and sptxt is essentially the same as one of the variations. Eric

[spctools-discuss] Re: convert Splib

2021-04-13 Thread Wenguang
Hi Ben, I think you can convert a spectral library in the format of sptxt into msp. However, you may need to write your own simple script to perform this text-based conversion. Best regards, Wenguang On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 6:09:37 PM UTC+1 benoit@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello, > >

Re: [spctools-discuss] Changes in number of peptides identifications in TPP 6.0 RC

2021-04-13 Thread Oded
Dear David, This is PeptideProphet issue (we don't use iProphet for this analysis). With the search parameters that I sent you followed by running the PeptideProphet command of *xinteract -Ninteract.pep.xml -p0.05 -l7 -PPM -OANEp -dDECOY Seq69478_QE2.pep.xml,* and lastly using a cutoff of 1%