No, not yet, and there are a couple of others that need to be posted as
well. Once I take care of that I will follow up here.
Richard
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, at 04:59 PM, g...@sourceauditor.com wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-legal-
> -Original Message-
> From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-legal-
> boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fontana
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:26 AM
> To: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> Subject: W3C-20150513 now OSI approved
>
> Hi,
>
> The OSI has now
Hello Jilayne;
On 02/12/2017 09:11, Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
Thanks for your request, Pedro.
I thought this looked familiar to a variant we have on the SPDX
License List - https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-Source-Code.html - but
the one you have found is indeed just the one clause!
IANAL (of
Hi,
The OSI has now approved the license SPDX publishes at
https://spdx.org/licenses/W3C-20150513.html .
Richard
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
Thanks for your request, Pedro.
I thought this looked familiar to a variant we have on the SPDX License List -
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-Source-Code.html - but the one you have found is
indeed just the one clause!
I'm curious, are you seeing this a lot in FreeBSD?
I would
