Hey Bradley,
just sorting through emails and wanted to make sure we came to some consensus
on this. If I understand correctly then, there really isn't a need for a short
identifier for AGPLv2 because it doesn't exist as a individual license in the
sense that it simply allows something under
]
-Original Message-
From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Jilayne Lovejoy
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Bradley M. Kuhn; SPDX-legal
Subject: Re: GNU [?] Affero General Public License v1.0
Hey Bradley,
just sorting through
that is an easy fix, as it only impacts the full name and not the short
identifiers (which is AGPL-#.0) - thanks Camille for noticing and David and
Bradley for the recollections.
I will log this for the next version of the SPDX License List.
We actually don't have AGPL version 2 on the SPDX
