On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Martin Michlmayr t...@hp.com wrote:
The following licenses appear on the SPDX list as OSI approved but
are currently not on opensource.org:
AFL-1.1
AFL-1.2
AFL-2.0
AFL-2.1
APSL-1.2
OSL-2.0
According to comments by John Cowan and Larry Rosen
* Jilayne Lovejoy jilayne.love...@openlogic.com [2013-02-14 17:59]:
6) missing short identifiers on OSI website or in OSI urls - I have noted
some where the url did not have the short identifier in the spreadsheet
version of the SPDX-LL, Martin - I can help you with that, if it's not
obvious.
I just went through the list of OSI Superseded and Retired Licenses at
http://opensource.org/licenses/do-not-use
and updated them to use SPDX identifiers.
I noticed that a few OSI approved (but superseded/retired) licenses
are not on the SPDX list:
- Jabber Open Source License
I forgot to mention one other problem:
SISSL is an OSI-approved license (but superseded). However, the SPDX
license list currently on the web site says that it's not OSI approved.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard
___
Martin - you read my mind, as I was just about to send an update of the
outstanding OSI-SPDX License List issues. I'm copying Karl Fogel, John
Cowan, as they are on the original string helping with these issues, as
well as the license-discuss list for OSI.
Complete list (combining yours and mine
Jilayne Lovejoy jilayne.love...@openlogic.com writes:
Martin - you read my mind, as I was just about to send an update of the
outstanding OSI-SPDX License List issues. I'm copying Karl Fogel, John
Cowan, as they are on the original string helping with these issues, as
well as the license-discuss
