J Lovejoy wrote:
> The SPDX License List includes a list of exceptions. These exceptions
> grant an exception to a license condition or additional permissions beyond
> those granted in a license; they are not stand-alone licenses. Exceptions
> are added to a license using the License
est spec.
>
> Cheers,
> Trevor
>
> [1]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-July/002036.html
> Subject: revised wording for top of exceptions page
> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 23:35:40 +0100
>
> Message-ID: <
To: Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com>
Cc: SPDX-legal <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>
Subject: Re: revised wording for top of exceptions page
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Richard Fontana
<rfont...@redhat.com<mailto:rfont...@redhat.com>> wrote:
There was one notorious
called
"exceptions" that are not "additional permissions".
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us>
To: "Phil Odence" <pode...@blackducksoftware.com>
Cc: "SPDX-legal" <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>
Sent: M
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:23:43PM +, Phil Odence wrote:
> The SPDX License List includes a list of Exceptions. These
> Exceptions are commonly-granted permissions beyond those normally
> granted in a license. (They are not stand-alone licenses.)
> Exceptions are added to a license using the
rg> on behalf of Jilayne Lovejoy
<opensou...@jilayne.com>
Date: Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 6:35 PM
To: SPDX-legal <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>
Subject: revised wording for top of exceptions page
Hi All,
As discussed on today’s call, all agreed that some clarification or revis
Hi All,
As discussed on today’s call, all agreed that some clarification or revision of
the explanatory text at the top of the license exceptions page was warranted.
(see current first paragraph here:
https://spdx.org/licenses/exceptions-index.html
