All makes sense to me. Good idea.
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of Steve
Winslow
Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 2:14 PM
To: Karsten Klein
Cc: J Lovejoy , SPDX-legal
Subject: Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Jilayne -- yes, I'd be open to a lighter-weight or
Nice. This certainly makes it easy to map from Fedora to SPDX IDs!
SPDX license identifiers have emerged as a standard
Woo hoo!
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of Steve
Winslow
Date: Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 12:06 PM
To: J Lovejoy
Cc: SPDX-legal , s...@lists.spdx.org
,
Good one for a Friday afternoon!
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of
Karsten Klein
Date: Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:22 PM
To: SPDX-legal , spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: Fun with licenses
Hi all,
did you know:
„the and any this you license software for that not use with may
Steve captures my same reactions well.
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of Steve
Winslow
Date: Friday, June 3, 2022 at 6:16 PM
To: Ria Schalnat (HPE)
Cc: Sebastian Crane , SPDX Legal Mailing List
, SPDX Technical Mailing List
Subject: Re: A suggestion to use Relationships for the
Yes, amazing!
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of Kate
Stewart
Date: Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:06 PM
To: Steve Winslow
Cc: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
Subject: Re: 3.20 License List release
Wow!40 new licenses. . . . that's a milestone for the license list
additions, I
Thanks, Jordi, for your patience and follow up.
The brand survey might take 160 seconds, but other than requiring you to think
a little bit, it’s not painful.
Phil
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org on behalf of Jordi
Mon Companys
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 12:33 PM
To:
